And Yet Another Masterfile Extortion Letter!
Well, it’s not hard to find information about these Masterfile folks… I got one of those FedEx letters today - -complete shock.
Several years ago I bought a software application from an organization that had images included in the standard template provided. I was unable to get the software to function properly as there were many security and functional problems, so I never used the software and standard images provided.
Fast forward to thirty days ago, I created a new webpage and used one of the images provided with the discarded software. Thought it was a good fit.
And – the infamous FedEx letter arrives... Anyway, I called and explained that I take copyright infringement seriously and where I got the image file. Masterfile representative Geoffrey Beal got serious quickly and I politely explained I wasn’t paying the extortion rate they requested $8520 for two images.
Actually, the template image I got with the software was only one image however it appears that somebody spliced the two together (or maybe broke the original into two images for publish on Masterfile).
Anyway, he indicated that this was the first step… After concluding the phone call I emailed Mr. Beal the following:
Dear Geoffrey Beal,
Thank you for informing XXXXX XXXX of a possible copyright issue.
The images in question where provided to XXXXX XXXX as part of a standard web template by the (company) Organization (www.company).
The original software file package provided to XXXXX XXXX is attached to this email.
Though it is not clear to XXXXX XXXX whom is the original copyright owner of the indicated images, I will be removing the images from my website.
All the best,
Signed by me
Anyway, I have contacted a local copyright attorney and am scheduled to meet next week.
I fully understand the issues, challenges and frustration one has with copyright infringement as I chase infringers around all the time. But, firing a first warning shot for $8520 seems way excessive and asking for a fight. In fact, from all I have read this is likely the business model of Masterfile.
I immediately removed the images, also I see no evidence Masterfile owns the copyright.
I’ll be ready.
Well, it’s not hard to find information about these Masterfile folks… I got one of those FedEx letters today - -complete shock.
Several years ago I bought a software application from an organization that had images included in the standard template provided. I was unable to get the software to function properly as there were many security and functional problems, so I never used the software and standard images provided.
Fast forward to thirty days ago, I created a new webpage and used one of the images provided with the discarded software. Thought it was a good fit.
And – the infamous FedEx letter arrives... Anyway, I called and explained that I take copyright infringement seriously and where I got the image file. Masterfile representative Geoffrey Beal got serious quickly and I politely explained I wasn’t paying the extortion rate they requested $8520 for two images.
Actually, the template image I got with the software was only one image however it appears that somebody spliced the two together (or maybe broke the original into two images for publish on Masterfile).
Anyway, he indicated that this was the first step… After concluding the phone call I emailed Mr. Beal the following:
Dear Geoffrey Beal,
Thank you for informing XXXXX XXXX of a possible copyright issue.
The images in question where provided to XXXXX XXXX as part of a standard web template by the (company) Organization (www.company).
The original software file package provided to XXXXX XXXX is attached to this email.
Though it is not clear to XXXXX XXXX whom is the original copyright owner of the indicated images, I will be removing the images from my website.
All the best,
Signed by me
Anyway, I have contacted a local copyright attorney and am scheduled to meet next week.
I fully understand the issues, challenges and frustration one has with copyright infringement as I chase infringers around all the time. But, firing a first warning shot for $8520 seems way excessive and asking for a fight. In fact, from all I have read this is likely the business model of Masterfile.
I immediately removed the images, also I see no evidence Masterfile owns the copyright.
I’ll be ready.