Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Author Topic: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?  (Read 16808 times)

Jerry Witt (mcfilms)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
    • View Profile
    • Motion City
Today I came across an interesting article about the Waybackmachine on Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wayback_Machine

It said:

"In an October 2004 case called "Telewizja Polska SA v. Echostar Satellite", a litigant attempted to use the Wayback Machine archives as a source of admissible evidence, perhaps for the first time. Telewizja Polska is the provider of TVP Polonia and EchoStar operates the Dish Network. Prior to the trial proceedings, EchoStar indicated that it intended to offer Wayback Machine snapshots as proof of the past content of Telewizja Polska’s website. Telewizja Polska brought a motion in limine to suppress the snapshots on the grounds of hearsay and unauthenticated source, but Magistrate Judge Arlander Keys rejected Telewizja Polska’s assertion of hearsay and denied TVP's motion in limine to exclude the evidence at trial.[15] However, at the actual trial, district Court Judge Ronald Guzman, the trial judge, overruled Magistrate Keys' findings, and held that neither the affidavit of the Internet Archive employee nor the underlying pages (i.e., the Telewizja Polska website) were admissible as evidence. Judge Guzman reasoned that the employee's affidavit contained both hearsay and inconclusive supporting statements, and the purported webpage printouts themselves were not self-authenticating.[16]"

So based on this, it seems to me that the troll's use of the wayback machine (or Internet archive) is limited. I suppose they'd have a hard time proving either the length of infringement OR even usage with shots from Archive.org. I guess this is why they are so anxious to have you tell them how long you used an image.
Although I may be a super-genius, I am not a lawyer. So take my scribblings for what they are worth and get a real lawyer for real legal advice. But if you want media and design advice, please visit Motion City at http://motioncity.com.

Robert Krausankas (BuddhaPi)

  • ELI Defense Team Member
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3354
    • View Profile
    • ExtortionLetterInfo
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #1 on: July 31, 2012, 01:46:15 PM »
Good find MC!! This could also potentially effect picscout I would think..Picscout scours your server for images, finds one, then finds a page on which the image is used, thus creating a screen capture we see in letters. This screenshot does not prove that the page in question was a "public facing" page, not does it prove that said page could be reached thru any navigational elements contained within the site.. Hell I have loads of pages on my server that are no longer used and not tied to the site in any way shape or form...this could certainly be a valid argument in my eyes.
Most questions have already been addressed in the forums, get yourself educated before making decisions.

Any advice is strictly that, and anything I may state is based on my opinions, and observations.
Robert Krausankas

I have a few friends around here..

Peeved

  • Guest
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #2 on: July 31, 2012, 02:20:49 PM »
I guess this is why they are so anxious to have you tell them how long you used an image.

Just one more reason to not engage in any dialog what so ever with them. Do not tell them a damn thing! Ask for proof of claim....period....end! Thanks for the post McFilms.
« Last Edit: July 31, 2012, 02:24:22 PM by Peeved »

SoylentGreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1503
    • View Profile
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #3 on: July 31, 2012, 02:21:11 PM »
This is a great posting, MC. Thanks.  The case is from Poland, right?
Too bad that this wouldn't be a solid precedent for folks residing in the US.
I guess that this really shows that it sometimes pays to just try an idea.
I would have assumed that the archive would have been pretty solid evidence.
One just never knows.

S.G.


Moe Hacken

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 465
  • We have not yet begun to hack
    • View Profile
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #4 on: July 31, 2012, 03:01:56 PM »
That's an interesting find, Jerry. It would be good to have a precedent like that in the U.S. Perhaps no one has thought of challenging Wayback Machine in a court yet, or perhaps it has been tried unsuccessfully.

As Robert said, if Wayback Machine's printouts were ruled not to be self-authenticating in the U.S., the ruling could apply to PicScout or other such content scrapers. Of course, that's all conjecture.
I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees

Greg Troy (KeepFighting)

  • ELI Defense Team Member
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1859
    • View Profile
    • Yeah, We Do That.
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #5 on: July 31, 2012, 09:19:53 PM »
The part that I found interesting and caught my eye was where it said that even the purported webpage printouts themselves were not self authenticating. To me that means that the screenshot Getty send you don't mean a darn thing or am I reading that wrong.

Again it might be an angle to attempt the next time Getty takes someone to court here in the states and has screenshots as evidence.
Every situation is unique, any advice or opinions I offer are given for your consideration only. You must decide what is best for you and your particular situation. I am not a lawyer and do not offer legal advice.

--Greg Troy

SoylentGreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1503
    • View Profile
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #6 on: July 31, 2012, 11:42:04 PM »
Good point, Greg.
It would be quite funny if Getty had to bring in a laptop to the court, and call up the actual website to prove their assertions.
By then, any alleged infringement would be gone of course.
lol.

S.G.


Jerry Witt (mcfilms)

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 682
    • View Profile
    • Motion City
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #7 on: August 01, 2012, 12:43:35 PM »
SG -- It's worth mentioning that Telewizja Polska is an Illinois corporation. I think this case was all in the US.
Although I may be a super-genius, I am not a lawyer. So take my scribblings for what they are worth and get a real lawyer for real legal advice. But if you want media and design advice, please visit Motion City at http://motioncity.com.

SoylentGreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1503
    • View Profile
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #8 on: August 01, 2012, 01:22:18 PM »
U so funny, MC.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Telewizja_Polska

ahh... I guess that you mean "Echostar Satellite"?



If so, then what a great precident.  Perhaps, one of the greatest finds EVER?

S.G.

« Last Edit: August 01, 2012, 01:25:43 PM by SoylentGreen »

Moe Hacken

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 465
  • We have not yet begun to hack
    • View Profile
I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees

SoylentGreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1503
    • View Profile
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #10 on: August 01, 2012, 01:29:25 PM »
Wow... who knew?
Here's my face right now:



S.G.


Moe Hacken

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 465
  • We have not yet begun to hack
    • View Profile
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #11 on: August 01, 2012, 02:12:08 PM »
So this ruling could possibly affect Wayback Machine printouts or other type of printouts offered as evidence by "strategic litigants," in the United States, as of right now. Perhaps no one has tried to go there since this case from 2005. Perhaps I'm wrong about that, further research would be required. I'll see what I can find.

I wonder if the Aloha Plastic Surgery legal team is thinking along these lines at all. Hawaii's court may take an Illinois precedent in consideration.

This may just be one the greatest finds ever, Jerry.
I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees

Moe Hacken

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 465
  • We have not yet begun to hack
    • View Profile
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #12 on: August 01, 2012, 04:34:40 PM »
Jerry, I found a very interesting article about this very same topic:

http://tinyurl.com/84ldxbl
I'd rather die on my feet than live on my knees

Greg Troy (KeepFighting)

  • ELI Defense Team Member
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1859
    • View Profile
    • Yeah, We Do That.
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #13 on: August 01, 2012, 10:20:58 PM »
Thank you for clarifying that Jerry, the fact that this was a US case makes this awesome news and will make it just that much harder for the copyright trolls!

SG -- It's worth mentioning that Telewizja Polska is an Illinois corporation. I think this case was all in the US.
Every situation is unique, any advice or opinions I offer are given for your consideration only. You must decide what is best for you and your particular situation. I am not a lawyer and do not offer legal advice.

--Greg Troy

lucia

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 767
    • View Profile
Re: Are Screenshots from the Wayback Machine useful as evidence?
« Reply #14 on: August 02, 2012, 10:10:07 PM »
Ahh! I see why the Wayback machine might not be good evidence.

The thing to remember: Images in a web site appear there through links.  The wayback sometimes changes the links and sometimes does not.  In both cases, there can be issues with using the screen shot as evidence of what happened in the past:

Quote
The links on archived Web sites may remain active
but link to different material from that associated with
the Web page at the time that it was archived. The linked
material may be to current sites or
to other stored link sites
from a different time. Indeed, links may connect to current
active sites and show current banner advertisements
available at the site,
rather than linking to sites as they
existed at the date of capture. ...

... In
short, the process of copying a Web site for archiving may
result in changes to the extent that the archived Web site
may not show accurately the links that existed at the time
shown for the Web site storage date. The Alexa Internet
crawler technology rewrites the original link code in html
to re-direct links to current or stored links.

The fact that the wayback sometimes changes the html of the page -- and in particular the links--would matter in court.  In cases about images, the images only appear through links. So, this can matter.  But how exactly it mattered will depend on what happened--- still.  It's interesting. Wayback machine evidence might not hold up.

 

Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.