ExtortionLetterInfo Forums
Retired Forums => ELI Responses: Media Coverage of Chan v. Ellis Case => Topic started by: Matthew Chan on August 02, 2014, 04:05:02 AM
-
Read the July 30, 2014 article by the Harvard Journal of Law & Technology Digest on ELI & Matthew Chan's Appeal Case being transferred to the Georgia Supreme Court.
http://jolt.law.harvard.edu/digest/copyright/georgia-supreme-court-takes-chan-v-ellis-appeal-to-redefine-first-amendment-right-on-the-internet-2
-
Nice to see that they added my corrections...NOT!
-
I'm glad to see they covered the story even without the corrections. I am seeing more and more people take interest in this case.
@ Matthew
I just noticed your new tag line....I like it. :)
Under the First Amendment, I have the right to share opinions using rhetorical hyperbole, colloquialisms, symbolism, snark, sarcasm, epithets, and military/combative language. Under Section 230 of CDA, I am responsible for posts I write, not other people's. I write in CONTEXT, not "quote fragments".