ExtortionLetterInfo Forums
ELI Forums => Higbee Associates Letter & Lawsuits Forum => Topic started by: kingkendall on December 04, 2018, 10:40:29 AM
-
JSN is giving copyright troll Christopher Sadowski all he can handle.
order Order on Motion for Reconsideration Mon 10:57 AM
ORDER denying18 Motion for Reconsideration: Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration or reargument, [dkt. no. 18], is denied. This Order constitutes a resolution to the motion for reconsideration. Therefore, as this Court directed previously [dkt. no. 25], Plaintiff shall post a bond no later than ten days from today in an amount not less than $10,000 in order to proceed with the action. (Signed by Judge Loretta A. Preska on 12/3/2018) (jwh)
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/23729445/Sadowski_v_JSN_Global_Media,_LLC
-
Nice. Is there a summary of this case somewhere other than Pacer? Where did the bond requirement come from?
-
This is an order by the presiding judge not liking the antics of the copyright lawyer. It wasn't the first time he got nailed.
-
I am not sure I would say the plaintiff is getting all they can handle. Plaintiff might not care or even know.
However, plaintiff’s attorney has major problems and, to probably nobody’s surprise, that attorney is Richard Liebowitz. The ruling on this motion is quite extraordinary. It shows a few things.
1. That judge appears to be on a growing list of judges who do not like Richard Liebowitz.
2. Opposing attorneys would be smart to file similar motions in every one of his cases. Requiring him or his clients to post a bond is a big hassle and might even cause some of his clients to hesitate to litigate.
3. At some point, attorneys working for The Liebowitz Law Firm may question that decision.
I am reading a rather long motion for attorneys fees against one of Liebowitz’s clients. If he loses it and the defendant gets even one half of the amount they are requesting, it will certainly make news. I will post a note about it when I am done reading it and the reply.
-
Some of the documents are available here.
https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6585383/sadowski-v-jsn-global-media-llc/
Nice. Is there a summary of this case somewhere other than Pacer? Where did the bond requirement come from?