ELI Forums > Higbee Associates Letter & Lawsuits Forum

Higbee's Greatest Courtroom Hits

(1/1)

icepick:
So check out this Motion to Strike Higbee filed in a case. You might notice the parties listed on page 2 Under I. are not the parties in this case. Cut & Paste gone wrong. How embarrassing for him.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6ZBMFkSS0ADcHJzVDRMYnZ6aXM

Now this. Higbee was trying to avoid leaving his desk in California on this case, using hired local guns instead. I guess the judge got tired of it, he ended up getting an order to personally appear lol

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6ZBMFkSS0ADWG4xbWI1MXJvdXc

Then when the conference finally happens, I guess the judge felt sorry for the guy and let him appear by phone instead of in person.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6ZBMFkSS0ADTWRYVldfODhPMkE

Matthew Chan:
My comments inline...  You too can have the Higbee lawyers represent you with their excellent attention to detail. :) This is what happens if you decide to go public with the lawsuit. Many more eyes looking and scrutinizing.


--- Quote from: icepick on September 30, 2017, 04:58:10 PM ---So check out this Motion to Strike Higbee filed in a case. You might notice the parties listed on page 2 Under I. are not the parties in this case. Cut & Paste gone wrong. How embarrassing for him.

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6ZBMFkSS0ADcHJzVDRMYnZ6aXM

LOL! They can't seem to figure out who the plaintiff really is. Is it Leif Skoogfors or Christopher Sadowski? And how about "CONNIE BRANABA & ASSOCIAATES, INC." an obvious TYPO of Associates.

Now this. Higbee was trying to avoid leaving his desk in California on this case, using hired local guns instead. I guess the judge got tired of it, he ended up getting an order to personally appear lol

https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B6ZBMFkSS0ADWG4xbWI1MXJvdXc

Actually, what I found interesting is this.

... Christopher Sadowski will give BackChina information about (a) the sale of the photograph - to whom it was licensed, for how much, and the market data; and (b) the top five selling photographs for the preceding five year.

It seems to me Sadowski will actually have to JUSTIFY his claim amounts, not just the cookie-cutter $5,000 in the Higbee letters.


--- End quote ---

guyshomenet:
I wonder if any of the disbarred lawyers from the Prenda firm work at Higbee.

Case in point. Here are two links for the same image:
http://stock-photos.nyphotographic.com/tablet-dictionary/authentic/
http://thebluediamondgallery.com/tablet-dictionary/a/authentic.html

The first web site belongs to the photographer Higbee represents and that site demands a license fee.

The second site lists the same photo for free under creative commons licensing. I image a lot of people see "free", do not notice the requirement for attribution, and later get a call from Higbee.

Perhaps not an outright scam like the Prenda operation, but it does call into question some things, not the least of which is that by setting-up the creative commons site, Google and Bing search engines flag the image as "labeled for reuse".

kingkendall:
@guyshomenet

Good work! 

Navigation

[0] Message Index