ExtortionLetterInfo Forums
ELI Forums => Higbee Associates Letter & Lawsuits Forum => Topic started by: kingkendall on July 19, 2018, 12:30:55 PM
-
Sadowski v. Jewish Voice Inc. et al
Can anybody explain this?
Docket last updated: 12 hours ago
Tuesday, July 10, 2018
14 14 9 pgs order Order on Motion for Protective Order Tue 3:45 PM ORDER granting/endorsing13 Amended Confidentiality Stipulation and Protective Order. See Order for details. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Cheryl L. Pollak on 7/10/2018. Blase, Brendan)
Tuesday, July 03, 2018
13 13 motion Protective Order Tue 7:14 PM
Amended MOTION for Protective Order by Christopher Sadowski. (Ngo, Rayminh)
-
i'll try to get some time to go into pacer to look at the supporting documents. My guess it's more for confidentiality, than "protection"
-
Protective orders are pretty common in civil litigation. The FRCP gives parties the ability to seek discovery on anything that could lead to relevant information. However, courts are also willing to grant reasonable orders to protect a wide range of things from trade secrets to personal identifying information, such as social security number or bank account numbers that might appear on discoverable documents. It could be a hundred different things.
-
It also looks like the parties/attorneys are playing nice. The Defendant stipulated to the request. Smart.
-
Shucks! I was hoping the protective order meant the defendant sent some boys over to the photog's house and give him an offer he couldn't refuse to drop the lawsuit. :)