Retired Forums > Hawaiian Letters & Lawsuits Forum

HAN v Moku'Aina Properties LLC

(1/2) > >>

Robert Krausankas (BuddhaPi):
STIPULATION TO DISMISS ALL PARTIES
AND ALL CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their
respective counsel, that the following claims in this action are dismissed with
prejudice, with each party to bear his or its own attorneys’ fees and costs.
This stipulation for dismissal with prejudice is made pursuant to Rule
41(A)(1)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and has been signed by the
respective counsel for each party who has made an appearance in this action. No Doe
defendants have been identified. There are no other remaining parties and/or issues.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, March 16, 2012.

lucia:
What does it mean?

Matthew Chan:
This sounds like they settled which was the likely outcome from the very beginning.

Lettered:
pure speculation on my part, but if we don't hear HAN gloat a number, I would think that would mean a win for our side (as in maybe HAN dropped the suit with stipulation that Moku'Aina not disclose details, so that they can move on to easier targets)?

SoylentGreen:
hmmm...
Even if a settlement was paid, it doesn't really prove that HAN could have won if the defendant chose to fight.
It's a bit murky.

S.G.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page