ExtortionLetterInfo Forums
Retired Forums => P2P/BitTorrent Lawsuits Forum => Topic started by: Robert Krausankas (BuddhaPi) on August 10, 2012, 12:31:55 PM
-
In recent months we've seen growing judicial skepticism of mass copyright lawsuits. Many judges have concluded that plaintiffs—often pornography publishers—have no interest in actually litigating cases and instead hope to use the threat of ruinous legal bills (not to mention the embarrassment of public association with pornography) to extract four-figure cash settlements from defendants. This strategy has the advantage, from the plaintiffs' point of view, that the innocent have almost as much incentive to settle their cases as do the guilty.
But the judiciary is far from unanimous. And this week, one judge sided squarely with the porn plaintiffs—again.
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2012/08/judge-sides-with-porn-p2p-plaintiff-setting-up-legal-showdown/