Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Author Topic: Critics: Righthaven not entitled to a ‘mulligan’  (Read 3060 times)

Robert Krausankas (BuddhaPi)

  • ELI Defense Team Member
  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3354
    • View Profile
    • ExtortionLetterInfo
Most questions have already been addressed in the forums, get yourself educated before making decisions.

Any advice is strictly that, and anything I may state is based on my opinions, and observations.
Robert Krausankas

I have a few friends around here..

SoylentGreen

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1503
    • View Profile
Re: Critics: Righthaven not entitled to a ‘mulligan’
« Reply #1 on: September 04, 2011, 11:50:21 AM »
Thanks for the links; good reading.

Allowing Righthaven to change its agreements with Stephens Media, and then letting them sue the alleged infringers again won't work.
Even if the judge(s) rule "without prejudice" in the Righthaven suits and they could re-try the infringment cases, that wouldn't change the fact that Righthaven didn't have copyright standing at the time of the infringement.
I cannot see how any change in the contractual agreements would be retroactive.

S.G.


 

Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.