Retired Forums > Righthaven Lawsuits Forum

Critics: Righthaven not entitled to a ‘mulligan’

(1/1)

Robert Krausankas (BuddhaPi):
This was posted on Aug 31

http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/aug/31/critics-righthaven-not-entitled-mulligan/

and this from the the 26th..

http://www.vegasinc.com/news/2011/aug/26/righthaven-denies-defaming-copyright-defendant/

SoylentGreen:
Thanks for the links; good reading.

Allowing Righthaven to change its agreements with Stephens Media, and then letting them sue the alleged infringers again won't work.
Even if the judge(s) rule "without prejudice" in the Righthaven suits and they could re-try the infringment cases, that wouldn't change the fact that Righthaven didn't have copyright standing at the time of the infringement.
I cannot see how any change in the contractual agreements would be retroactive.

S.G.

Navigation

[0] Message Index