Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Author Topic: Digital Millenium Copyright Act Agent - Protections?  (Read 9060 times)

parkerbenson

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Digital Millenium Copyright Act Agent - Protections?
« on: April 15, 2011, 05:00:23 PM »
Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) Agent

The DMCA states that “a service provider shall not be liable for monetary relief, or . . . for infringement of copyright by reason of the storage at the direction of a user of material that resides on a system or network controlled or operated by or for the service provider.”

Does a website owner qualify as a "service provider" if a web designer uploads content that later turns out be claimed by Getty as infringement?

Is it necessary to register a DMCA Agent to be protected by the DMCA, it appears to be?

Can registering an agent after receiving a demand letter, and removing the content in question, help with this process?

excerpt of law:

(1) In general. -  A service provider shall not be liable for monetary relief, or, except as provided in subsection (j), for injunctive or other equitable relief, for infringement of copyright by reason of the storage at the direction of a user of material that resides on a system or network controlled or operated by or for the service provider, if the service provider -

(A)  

(i)  does not have actual knowledge that the material or an activity using the material on the system or network is infringing;

(ii)  in the absence of such actual knowledge, is not aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent; or

(iii)  upon obtaining such knowledge or awareness, acts expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material;

(B)  Does not receive a financial benefit directly attributable to the infringing activity, in a case in which the service provider has the right and ability to control such activity; and

(C)  upon notification of claimed infringement as described in paragraph (3), responds expeditiously to remove, or disable access to, the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity.

(2) Designated agent. - The limitations on liability established in this subsection apply to a service provider only if the service provider has designated an agent to receive notifications of claimed infringement described in paragraph (3), by making available through its service, including on its website in a location accessible to the public, and by providing to the Copyright Office, substantially the following information:

(A)  the name, address, phone number, and electronic mail address of the agent.

(B)  other contact information which the Register of Copyrights may deem appropriate.

The Register of Copyrights shall maintain a current directory of agents available to the public for inspection, including through the Internet, in both electronic and hard copy formats, and may require payment of a fee by service providers to cover the costs of maintaining the directory.

(3) Elements of notification. -

(A)  To be effective under this subsection, a notification of claimed infringement must be a written communication provided to the designated agent of a service provider that includes substantially the following:

(i)  A physical or electronic signature of a person authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

(ii)  Identification of the copyrighted work claimed to have been infringed, or, if multiple copyrighted works at a single online site are covered by a single notification, a representative list of such works at that site.

(iii)  Identification of the material that is claimed to be infringing or to be the subject of infringing activity and that is to be removed or access to which is to be disabled, and information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to locate the material.

(iv)  Information reasonably sufficient to permit the service provider to contact the complaining party, such as an address, telephone number, and, if available, an electronic mail address at which the complaining party may be contacted.

(v)  A statement that the complaining party has a good faith belief that use of the material in the manner complained of is not authorized by the copyright owner, its agent, or the law.

(vi)  A statement that the information in the notification is accurate, and under penalty of perjury, that the complaining party is authorized to act on behalf of the owner of an exclusive right that is allegedly infringed.

(B)  

(i)  Subject to clause (ii), a notification from a copyright owner or from a person authorized to act on behalf of the copyright owner that fails to comply substantially with the provisions of subparagraph (A) shall not be considered under paragraph (1)(A) in determining whether a service provider has actual knowledge or is aware of facts or circumstances from which infringing activity is apparent.

(ii)  In a case in which the notification that is provided to the service provider's designated agent fails to comply substantially with all the provisions of subparagraph (A) but substantially complies with clauses (ii), (iii), and (iv) of subparagraph (A), clause (i) of this subparagraph applies only if the service provider promptly attempts to contact the person making the notification or takes other reasonable steps to assist in the receipt of notification that substantially complies with all the provisions of subparagraph (A).

Oscar Michelen

  • ELI Legal Warrior
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1301
    • View Profile
    • Courtroom Strategy
Re: Digital Millenium Copyright Act Agent - Protections?
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2011, 09:14:20 PM »
A generic website does not qualify under the DMCA otherwise the law would have no value. Having a web designer you hire put up images on your website for your benefit is not the same as some 14 year old uploading the latest Justin Bieber video to YouTube. YouTube has no way of knowing what's on its site until someone complains of it.  It is not logical to require them to police every single post.  A business owner however has the ability to control and direct his web designer who is his agent or contractor.

parkerbenson

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 24
    • View Profile
Re: Digital Millenium Copyright Act Agent - Protections?
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2011, 11:36:32 PM »
makes sense.  it's quite unfortunate that Getty is so unreasonable.  if their demand letter was more reasonable, it would actually encourage people to admit an honest error, pay a small fee, and perhaps become a paying customer.

instead, they are taking bully tactics, and i hope that the government takes action to address this legislatively so that individuals don't have to battle this in court.

Oscar Michelen

  • ELI Legal Warrior
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1301
    • View Profile
    • Courtroom Strategy
Re: Digital Millenium Copyright Act Agent - Protections?
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2011, 07:44:27 PM »
I agree 100%

 

Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.