At the time Getty Images, Masterfile, and Imageline got most of our attention. You were at the bleeding edge where little was known about Hawaiian Art Network. It was your letter that started the ongoing coverage of HAN and their lawyer's shenanigans. Brandon was one of the first lawyers that we learned worked with HAN. And being the dumb young lawyer he was, he never imagined anyone would ever get wind of the $10K threat. Nor did he imagine that he would get caught saying that you would go to jail for not settling.
Make no mistake, the folks at HAN and those who work with them better watch themselves. Hawaii is a small place and word has gotten out on HAN and their entrapment friends like Vincent Tylor. This is no longer idle speculation. There is just way too much evidence to the contrary that a lot of this is one big EEE (excessive/entrapment/extortion) scam.
To directly answer your question, HAN is being more careful what they release because they know it could end up here on ELI and subsequently on Google, Facebook, and Scribd.
Getty Images came down quite a bit on the amounts they were seeking some time ago. Oscar and I believe that ELI's ongoing pressure and exposure forced them to adjust their strategy a bit. Oscar alone had hundreds of cases on his desk. That doesn't include those people who ignored Getty or independently fought Getty. It was enough of an impact to force some adjustments.
And as much as we are loathe to admit it, Getty's approach starts looking much more professional and attractive when compared to Imageline, HAN, and their lawyers.
Why was my demand letter asking $10,000...everyone else seems to be getting letters for sooooooooooo much less???