Ethan Seven,
The issue of Oscar representing people throughout the U.S. has come up before and I did ask him about it many years ago when ELI was very young. ELI is now ten years old! The representation issue is in the same vein as Higbee, and many other copyright lawyers representing their clients (not all based in the lawyer's own state) sending out letters to accused infringers throughout the U.S. I don't remember the technical explanation but you did jog my memory a bit. I think it is related to the fact that copyright infringement is a federal matter, not a state matter. One has to be a U.S. lawyer admitted to federal court I think? As such, somehow by virtue of the fact that copyright infringement is a federal matter, it allows all the lawyers on BOTH sides to both litigate and defend. I don't remember the finer points of how it works in an actual court case in the federal court system, but I think it involves calling in a local state lawyer to work with them. But there has never been any doubt in my mind what he does is entirely legitimate.
Oscar has been involved in lots of cases in many jurisdictions over the years. He may even be licensed in NJ I think but I have always referred to Oscar as a New York lawyer who takes on both copyright prosecutions and copyright defense. He has been on both sides of the fight. That has never been a secret.
Last thing, thanks to you, I caught a clerical error I made about the missing "Attorney Advertising" disclaimer on this page: https://www.extortionletterinfo.com/oscar-michelens-copyright-legal-defense-representation-program/
That was a page newly created and rewritten sometime in January 2018. For years, Oscar has always insisted that I put in the "Attorney Advertising" disclaimer on his one ELI page dedicated to promoting and explaining his legal service. Up until then, the page was always written in my voice and as a personal endorsement. I would get into a debate with him that it was MY personal endorsement freely given because I believe in his legal expertise and abilities. I have found Oscar to be a man and lawyer of integrity. Hence, I have always been resistant to the idea of "Attorney Advertisement" vs. my personal endorsement.
In an exercise of caution and in the spirit of Oscar's personal preference and insistence, The Attorney Advertisement disclaimer has existed for years. However, during the rewrite/revision, I somehow accidentally left out the Attorney Advertisement disclaimer. That is on me. I made the clerical error and no one caught it. Up to now, no one said anything. But your casual reference about it made me go back and look at that page again more carefully. I reinstated the Attorney Advertisement disclaimer Oscar has always insisted upon that was inadvertently left off by me.
Thank you for the catch.
The issue of Oscar representing people throughout the U.S. has come up before and I did ask him about it many years ago when ELI was very young. ELI is now ten years old! The representation issue is in the same vein as Higbee, and many other copyright lawyers representing their clients (not all based in the lawyer's own state) sending out letters to accused infringers throughout the U.S. I don't remember the technical explanation but you did jog my memory a bit. I think it is related to the fact that copyright infringement is a federal matter, not a state matter. One has to be a U.S. lawyer admitted to federal court I think? As such, somehow by virtue of the fact that copyright infringement is a federal matter, it allows all the lawyers on BOTH sides to both litigate and defend. I don't remember the finer points of how it works in an actual court case in the federal court system, but I think it involves calling in a local state lawyer to work with them. But there has never been any doubt in my mind what he does is entirely legitimate.
Oscar has been involved in lots of cases in many jurisdictions over the years. He may even be licensed in NJ I think but I have always referred to Oscar as a New York lawyer who takes on both copyright prosecutions and copyright defense. He has been on both sides of the fight. That has never been a secret.
Last thing, thanks to you, I caught a clerical error I made about the missing "Attorney Advertising" disclaimer on this page: https://www.extortionletterinfo.com/oscar-michelens-copyright-legal-defense-representation-program/
That was a page newly created and rewritten sometime in January 2018. For years, Oscar has always insisted that I put in the "Attorney Advertising" disclaimer on his one ELI page dedicated to promoting and explaining his legal service. Up until then, the page was always written in my voice and as a personal endorsement. I would get into a debate with him that it was MY personal endorsement freely given because I believe in his legal expertise and abilities. I have found Oscar to be a man and lawyer of integrity. Hence, I have always been resistant to the idea of "Attorney Advertisement" vs. my personal endorsement.
In an exercise of caution and in the spirit of Oscar's personal preference and insistence, The Attorney Advertisement disclaimer has existed for years. However, during the rewrite/revision, I somehow accidentally left out the Attorney Advertisement disclaimer. That is on me. I made the clerical error and no one caught it. Up to now, no one said anything. But your casual reference about it made me go back and look at that page again more carefully. I reinstated the Attorney Advertisement disclaimer Oscar has always insisted upon that was inadvertently left off by me.
Thank you for the catch.
What basis do you have to think he takes claims that do not involve a party in NY? Did you look to see if any other attorneys in his law firm are admitted in other states?
All he would need is for the client or for the copyright holder to be in a state where he is admitted or, if the contract is with his law firm, any state where one of his associates is admitted. Keep in mind that a couple federal courts do not require an attorney to be a member of the state bar.
Some of the content on this site could, emphasis on could, be construed as attorney advertising. I would have lots of disclaimers on it if I were Mr. Michelin, but that is different than unauthorized practice of law.