Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Topics - AndrewRaia

Pages: [1]
1
or at least make some valid points?

Quote
Dear Mrs. Kingston,

This and all previous communications are not an admission of guilt, however, I am obligated to defend myself accordingly.

According to US Copyright law, infringement in section (b) is defined below.

§ 501. Infringement of copyright
(b) The legal or beneficial owner of an exclusive right under a copyright is entitled, subject to the requirements of section 411, to institute an action for any infringement of that particular right committed while he or she is the owner of it. The court may require such owner to serve written notice of the action with a copy of the complaint upon any person shown, by the records of the Copyright Office or otherwise, to have or claim an interest in the copyright, and shall require that such notice be served upon any person whose interest is likely to be affected by a decision in the case. The court may require the joinder, and shall permit the intervention, of any person having or claiming an interest in the copyright.


The key phrase is this "any person shown, by the records of the Copyright Office or otherwise, to have or claim an interest in the copyright". You have yet to show me an official record of the Copyright holder for the images in question, so I took it upon myself to search the US Copyright Departments Public database and found the following results.

Getty Images - http://bit.ly/JhcVDV
Paul Conrath (Photographer) - http://bit.ly/IZ18Lc
Tristan Paviot (Photographer) - http://bit.ly/KYKIFK

As show in the Copyright Office search above, neither you or the photographer have any claim to a copyright on the referenced images. According to US Copyright Law, with no legal copyright to the image, you have no legal basis to file suit or seek damages.

This will be my final communication to you in this matter. I request a signed letter from your firm that you will no longer be pursuing this matter. Any further attempt to reach me on this matter beyond this requested letter shall be considered harassment and I will be forced to exercise my valid legal options.

Regards,
Andrew

on another note, it may not matter if this letter works, but she said they were seeking actual damages, according to copyright law.

§ 504. Remedies for infringement: Damages and profits
(b) Actual Damages and Profits. — The copyright owner is entitled to recover the actual damages suffered by him or her as a result of the infringement, and any profits of the infringer that are attributable to the infringement and are not taken into account in computing the actual damages. In establishing the infringer's profits, the copyright owner is required to present proof only of the infringer's gross revenue, and the infringer is required to prove his or her deductible expenses and the elements of profit attributable to factors other than the copyrighted work.


My site was not a registered company, I made no money, I have no records, and they have no way to show any actual damages. It was a hobby site. I would point this out to them but I am not sure if at this point it is necessary.

2
Anyone have time to read and interpret for the Ley Man? Got through the first few pages before my head began to spin lol

http://bit.ly/IpRswF

3
Hey guys, just want to say I am glad this forum. I few years back I received a claim letter from Getty Images, now today I finally received a letter from Mr. McCormack. I emailed them with the case info asking for them to provide proof of the copyright holders claim to the image and how they determined the value they are asking for. I will keep you guys posted, I am going to read some more of the forums.

Thanks Guys

EDIT:
Upon doing some research it appears that there is a statute of limitations that begins once the infringing material has been removed. My site was taken down back in 2006ish, would it be appropriate to respond to Mr. McCormack and inform him that the statute has expired and he can't proceed with litigation?

Pages: [1]
Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.