Show Posts
1
Getty Images Letter Forum / Corbis and their copyright on old public domain images?
« on: June 14, 2011, 09:16:16 AM »
Hi - I have a question, hoping you can help me, I asked this on the Facebook page as I had found it first, and was directed here.
I haven't gotten any extortion letters, but hoping to do the right thing and prevent them!
I've been asked by my employer, which makes art prints, to search for public domain images of old movie stars such as Marilyn Monroe. Pretty much every webpage out there says that back in the 50s-60s publicity photographs of stars were not copyrighted, or if they were, most studios did not bother renewing copyright after a few years after the movie, and they became public domain. I have found several photos we'd like to use, but am checking into each one to make sure that it is in fact public domain and is ok to use.
I came across the same images on Corbis Images, which wants a ridiculous amount of money for the licensing of each photo! Do they take public domain images and ask for money for them - or is everyone else wrong and these photos ARE copyrighted, or copyright somehow came to Corbis Images after the copyright laws were changed?? I'm hoping this makes sense. I don't want to land my employer into very hot water so I'm trying to do the right thing and find information about each image. This being the internet, it's a long process!
Of course, I realise there are some photos that are still copyrighted based on whatever the agreements were with the photographers/studios at the time. I've found some that are, so I'm steering clear of those.
Also interestingly enough, Marilyn Monroe was ruled to be in public domain in 2007... again according to the internet (where everything needs to be checked and triple-checked!) But even so, it depends on the photographer who took images of her, doesn't it?
And if I do trust every other statement about these particular 50s publicity pictures being public domain, and my employer uses them, what's the likelihood of the company receiving one of the famous letters from Corbis since they claim to own the images to license them out?
Also, I am in Australia. I notice that Corbis Images has an Australian division. Does this affect anything?
I haven't gotten any extortion letters, but hoping to do the right thing and prevent them!
I've been asked by my employer, which makes art prints, to search for public domain images of old movie stars such as Marilyn Monroe. Pretty much every webpage out there says that back in the 50s-60s publicity photographs of stars were not copyrighted, or if they were, most studios did not bother renewing copyright after a few years after the movie, and they became public domain. I have found several photos we'd like to use, but am checking into each one to make sure that it is in fact public domain and is ok to use.
I came across the same images on Corbis Images, which wants a ridiculous amount of money for the licensing of each photo! Do they take public domain images and ask for money for them - or is everyone else wrong and these photos ARE copyrighted, or copyright somehow came to Corbis Images after the copyright laws were changed?? I'm hoping this makes sense. I don't want to land my employer into very hot water so I'm trying to do the right thing and find information about each image. This being the internet, it's a long process!
Of course, I realise there are some photos that are still copyrighted based on whatever the agreements were with the photographers/studios at the time. I've found some that are, so I'm steering clear of those.
Also interestingly enough, Marilyn Monroe was ruled to be in public domain in 2007... again according to the internet (where everything needs to be checked and triple-checked!) But even so, it depends on the photographer who took images of her, doesn't it?
And if I do trust every other statement about these particular 50s publicity pictures being public domain, and my employer uses them, what's the likelihood of the company receiving one of the famous letters from Corbis since they claim to own the images to license them out?
Also, I am in Australia. I notice that Corbis Images has an Australian division. Does this affect anything?