Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Robert Krausankas (BuddhaPi)

Pages: 1 ... 99 100 [101] 102 103 ... 194
1501
I think you read it correctly Jerry, remember Nancy Wolff from PACA was in cahoots with someone from the copyright office ( her name escapes me at the moment ) and Nancy Wolff was the one herself who suggested that registrations should be done "her way", never mind what the law says, as "Wolffs Way" will be cheaper, faster and less work on the copyright office..Once her "friend" in the copyright office was sucked into this new method, she promptly told the stock agencies, "sure you can do it this way"....WRONG!!

I guess Ms. Wolff is now living under a bridge with a family of trolls, licking her woundsand feeling really stupid...

1502
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Don't Pay Getty - Thank you ELI
« on: August 16, 2012, 02:11:42 PM »
Getty Images does everything half-assed..nobody "vets" anything, it's not part of the clerks job description to check anything before sending the typical form letter complete with typos, incorrect names, bad screenshots....we've seen it so many times, I think I have a good idea of the complete process:

1. picscout reports an image
2. some script checks to see if it is on getty's site
3. send letter
4. send letter
5. send letter

Actually looking into anything BEFORE sending the letter would cost them time and effort, which in turns hurts profit margin..JUST PAY US!

Hard to believe after more than 3 years I still get my panties in a knot over these asshats!

IMHO, Jonathan Klien and those behind the "letter program" are such dirt bags, i wouldn't piss in their mouth if their teeth were on fire...

end of rant!



1503
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Getty Images Sold!
« on: August 16, 2012, 11:24:23 AM »
Wow, that is quite a plan!  Will this launch Timmy's new career as an International Copyright Compliance __________?  You all can fill in the blank.

"Douchebag!"

1504
Do they even sell images anymore?  lol.

S.G.

Nope they support the postal service!

1505
The copyright office will allow registration of photo compilations to provide individual protection to the images contained in the compilation but only if each photograph is identified separately and have a common author.
By "have a common author" do you mean "Joe Schmoe, photographer" could register a compilation of 10 photos all taken by "Joe Schmoe" provided each photo is identified separately?

That's how I read it, for example Getty's Stone collection would not be able to be one compilation, as it consists of many photographers, I guess they would have to be seperated by artist then registered as multiple collections, instead of just one ginormous one.

1506
In response to the Muench case, the Copyright Office (by way of Marybeth Peters) has put forth an official regulation regarding group registration of photographs. Part of the reason why courts did not give great deference to Marybeth's letters to Nancy Wolff was that they were not official regulations promulgated by the Copyright Office. To correct that, the Office issued 76 CFR 4072 an interim rule establishing a pilot program regarding the registration of copyrights for photo collections.  Here the link to view the reg.: http://www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2011/76fr4072.pdf 

The copyright office will allow registration of photo compilations to provide individual protection to the images contained in the compilation but only if each photograph is identified separately and have a common author. For automated databases, the regulation requires that the entire image be uploaded and not just a description of the image. The reg is silent as to whether the author's name must be listed as well. While this type of regulation is entitled to more deference than the informal letter PACA previously acquired from their wholly owned subsidiary, the Copyright Office, to the extent it allows for  something other than what is required by the Copyright Act, I still think it is not enough to give individual protection to the works included in a compilation registration.

Although Oscar may not think that it is enough to give individual protection to the works included in a compilation registration, at least us "pirates" may now SEE EACH INDIVIDUAL PHOTOGRAPH of the compilations!

of coarse this observation is going on the idea that Getty starts registering their images, they haven't thus far, and nothing makes me think they will in the future. The company may have sold for a shitload of money, but in realty getty Images is not worth nearly that amount, so I doubt they will register anything, as SG state time is money, and the only money they are making is coming from big media and extortion letters....

and while were talking about Getty Images, I think it only right to give Timothy McCormack little plug as well..

Hey copyright cow, I have a question!! Why is it if you are getty's "outside counsel", that in the very few lawsuits they filed, your name is never mentioned??...Could it possibly be that your not a "courtroom lawyer" but actully just a collections clerk??..

1507
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Don't Pay Getty - Thank you ELI
« on: August 15, 2012, 01:49:46 PM »
welcome to the forum, and thanks for sharing your story...reminds of the time they went after someone for using a picture of a fighter jet, that was taken by another fighter jet pilot...They want OUR Money!, they don't care how they get it they just want it , and they want it now!! I strongly suggest if they pursue this any further you file a complaint with the washington state attorney general, your stat AG, ect....

1508
I think if an artist / stock agency wants "individual protection to the works included in a compilation registration" each work should be submitted with image, author, creation date, first publication, ect...just like if you were registering a single work...yeah it would be a huge time suck for the artist, and be an expense as well, but if they want the work protected...oh well such is life 

1509
Don't worry Greg.  By last count, it was running about one cringe per ten bouts of laughter

I could probably even this ratio out a bit if you'd like!  ::)

1510
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Getty Images Sold!
« on: August 15, 2012, 09:33:32 AM »
I was just going to post this, you beat me to the punch... :)

So what do you think this will mean for all the extortion letter recipients... We know Getty has been lax a pursuing cases against "infringers" but where will we stand with this new owner...

I don't see any changes coming, after all they generate a good amount of revenue from the letters...they'll keep coming..by all appearances the management "team" will stay in place..as for them being "lax" this will continue as well, as the majority of their images are not registered and those that are may very well be improperly registered..even more so now, with the recent Masterfile loss..

1511
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Getty Images Sold!
« on: August 15, 2012, 09:21:38 AM »
The Carlyle Group plans on "harnessing" its financial resources and global network "to help take Getty Images to the next stage of product innovation and global growth," says Eliot Merrill, managing director of the Carlyle Group.

In a prepared statement, Klein says: "This partnership with The Carlyle Group reflects and bolsters our ongoing strategy, strong management team and the talent of our dedicated employees. We are delighted to collaborate with Carlyle, with its formidable pedigree and success, and take the business into its next phase of development and growth."

Mark Getty adds: "In seventeen years, we have built a business that has revolutionized the industry, with innovation at its core. I am confident that the partnership between Getty Images and The Carlyle Group will see the company's success continue."

Can't help but wonder if carlyle knows what they are getting into..

1512
Is the content being "copied" in an IFrame? If so I don't think it would be any different than googles image search, they are not being copied, but pulled directly from the source.Which would lead back to the perfect10 case. I can't speak for the registration itself, but it seems you will collecting all the good stuff, screen shots are sure handy to have

1513
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Defense Letter Program
« on: August 13, 2012, 05:20:50 PM »
We know Timmy well, he is Getty's favorite collection attorney.. what you need to realize is that this is a claim, not a debt, you haven't been found guilty of anything at this point. Being that your 2/3's thru the statute, you might be able to make it the rest of the way, while at the same time being a thorn in their side.. You could answer McCormack and demand proof of their claim ( which they will not supply) at which time you can re-reply to him that, if they do not supply proof you will consider the matter closed, and if they continue to contact you, you will submit complaints to the WA Attorney General, The WA Bar association, as well the AG of your home state..that "MAY" chill him out a bit, bottom line is you only need to stretch it out a little over 1 yr. I suggest you keep reading to get educated before making a decision...

1514
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Defense Letter Program
« on: August 13, 2012, 03:41:03 PM »
I wouldn't say you "case gets dropped", but your will be represented by a very good and well known IP attorney, Getty can no longer contact you, everything must go thru your attorney. They may offer a reduced settlement amount, which you can accept or turn down, or there is a chance they could file suit, the chances of this are very slim if you are dealing with 1 image, if you're dealing with 20 - 30 images, that's a completely different ball game.. For the most part folks just end up waiting out the 3 year statute of limitations.

1515
Hawaiian Letters & Lawsuits Forum / Re: More Vincent K Tylor seeding?
« on: August 13, 2012, 07:14:47 AM »
I remember seeing this a while back, 4 things lead me to think it's not him, or his blog.

1. of the images is not his, as you can see in the watermark
2. you can glean a little info from the "author" here: http://a6508.wordpress.com/author/a6508/
3. all f the header images are standard wordpress theme 2010/2011 images ( owned by someone else)
4. there are links towards the in bottom in Korean

Even if this was in an attempt to bury some of the free PR he received, it wouldn't be nearly enough.

Pages: 1 ... 99 100 [101] 102 103 ... 194
Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.