Messages

196

Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread

« on: February 12, 2017, 09:12:57 AM »

Another "woman" comes out of the blue? This time it is "Marissa"?

And why the ongoing impersonation of a yet another woman? What is that all about?

Yes "Marissa" has been around since the beginning, we just haven't exposed her yet...or is it him? or he/she?

The ongoing impersonation of woman is fairly easy to explain.. Joel Albrizio who is suspected to be behind VOJF has no balls, and likes to hide behind different names, and he chooses womens names because (i'm guessing here) that "women" would likely be more "offended" by the porn references. One has to wonder if Brendon and Ashley are proud of good ole dad while he continues to make a mockery of his name and already soiled reputation.

197

Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread

« on: February 11, 2017, 05:14:51 PM »

I don't know how the VOJF blog aurhor ( Joel Albrizio ) keeps up with these bogus names and email accounts, we've already shown "Jessica Langston" as coming from a Pawtucket RI IP address, now we once again have another email from "Marissa Davenport"...who doesn't exist in Jupiter..shocking I know..

Joel/Jessica/Marissa or whatever the name of the day is also seems to think I am responsible for any google results for the garbage that clearly was written by him...sorry that's not my doing, the VOJF authors are solely responsible for that... and to label my "post" regarding Brendon Albrizio getting a new job outside of Adlife Marketing as an "attack" is really pretty stupid..up to this point VOJF hasn't seen an attack from me in any way shape or form, neither has any innocent parties. I've simply reported on Adlife business practices, and some of the lawsuits that Joel Albrizio has been involved with..But all that may be about to change in the very near future.

From: Marissa Davenport <[email protected]>
Date: February 10, 2017 at 6:25:30 PM EST
To: [email protected]
Subject: Robert's Written Narrative Continues!

We had asked and expected Robert to better understand his affect on others, especially you.

It was our intention to move on and delete posted information. This has not been the case and so we will begin again.

Please let us know when Robert ends his written attacks so as we had intended we may delete posts.

Marissa

198

Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread

« on: February 11, 2017, 07:37:43 AM »

Something else that "Joelssica" is not considering, is that if someone were to decide to get get nasty and really fight back, not only does the Albrizio name have many more members to poke, but also Adlife Marketing has a bunch of innocent or largely innocent people involved which could easily become targets, much like the author of VOJF decided to pull names out of a hat.. I'm fairly confident Brendon Albrizio wouldn't want his name mentioned over and over, and over again considering he just landed a new job.. At the end of the day I doubt Joel Albrizio really cares about his coworkers Sharon Ferretti, Douglas Fleaurant, Jeremy Howard or the other employees, but they all run the risk of being in the "line of fire" the longer VOJF stays online.

199

Legal Controversies Forum / Re: Some basic copyright questions to discuss

« on: February 10, 2017, 05:13:30 PM »

I'll just drop this here, as it somewhat applies to the discussion:

https://petapixel.com/2017/02/08/imitation-vs-copying-photography-issue-derivative-works/

200

Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread

« on: February 10, 2017, 11:45:27 AM »

Well, I can now confirm something I learned nearly a month ago.. Adlife Marketing & Communications COO and Joel Albrizios son Brendon Albrizio has up and left Adlife Marketing.. He now is employed by Crayon.co.

https://www.linkedin.com/in/balbrizio/

https://www.crayon.co/

So the questions remain:

1. Did the leave for a better opportunity?
2. Was this a financial decision, court documents show Adlife had a previous issue concerning employee wages.
3. Is Adlife Marketing indeed a listing ship, about to go under?
4. Did he leave because of his possible disgust over not only the copyright trolling / extortion scheme, and perhaps because of the disgusting behavior of someone in the Adlife Camp ( suspected to be none other than his father Joel Albrizio) concerning the voices of jupiter florida blog?

Join the conversation with your thoughts!

201

Legal Controversies Forum / Re: Some basic copyright questions to discuss

« on: February 09, 2017, 07:43:39 PM »

Getty is a commercial business, they license images for different uses, at different price points, IE royalty free, rights managed etc..they are in business to sell images, not to give them away for "personal use" so to my knowledge no such license exists....

to get back to question #1...you're over thinking it...it's really very simple... ceate an image, you own the copyright to it.

202

Legal Controversies Forum / Re: Some basic copyright questions to discuss

« on: February 09, 2017, 05:08:20 PM »

In regards to question number 4, the answers lie within the DMCA statutes, which affords the sites in question safe harbor from infringement claims, providing they have a registered agent, and follow the rules set forth.

203

Legal Controversies Forum / Re: Some basic copyright questions to discuss

« on: February 09, 2017, 10:28:27 AM »

You're argument is flawed IMHO....I suggest you read the entire article you linked to to learn more about the "creatvity" aspect, we are talking about photographs and images here, not a listing for a recipe, or the whitepages ,but at stated before you can "argue" whatever you like.. but in defense i would simply argue and refute your claim, by stating I set up my camera with certain settings, such as shutterspeed, aperture, amount of flash, depth of field etc.to create my image, that in and of itself would set the "creativity" you speak of..to further that I then "process" the image, ie "edit" the image, as all RAW files must be edited to some degree, my editing of this image also adds to the creativity.

I might suggest you read the actual law as stated:

https://www.copyright.gov/circs/circ01.pdf

https://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap1.html

You're Mona Lisa argument is also flawed, that image is in the public domain, as is anything created before 1923 ( i believe).. so yes you could take a picture of that iconic image, own the copyright of "your" image, and also sell that image if you so choose too.

204

Legal Controversies Forum / Re: Some basic copyright questions to discuss

« on: February 08, 2017, 10:29:43 AM »

I'll contribute here, as I have time...my comments regard US law only..
you state:
1) Regarding copyright protection: It seems to me that every stock photo agency and also the infringers assume that the pictures are copyright protected. However,
- US copyright requires the work to be 'original', meaning that it needs a minimal degree of creativity.

FALSE...copyright exists at the moment of creation.."creativity" has nothing to do with anything... The degree of "protection" depends on if the image is properly registered, but there remains some level of protection regardless.

you state:
With that in mind let's assume I get sued for selling posters of 20 getty pictures of a celebrity on the red carpet on one event. I do not have a licence.

Could't I argue that those pictures are not copyright protected and therefore there can't be an infringement? Surely, it took some skill to take these photos, but creativity? If I see photographers taking pictures at these big events it's all about taking as many pictures as possible and then sorting out those who are sellable. I do understand that some argue that what is worth copying is worth protecting, but I'm missing the creativity requirement in that approach.

You can argue whatever you like, the facts speak for themselves, if you used a getty image or any image you did not create without a valid license, you have infringed...and may be could liable for such. You are missing the creativity requirement, because there is none.

you state"
And something else came to my mind:
Let's assume those 20 pictures look all more or less the same and were all taken by one photographer.
On the other hand: Let's assume those 20 pictures look all more or less the same and were taken by 20 photographers.
Could that open the field for some arguments against protection? Could I for example say that they all look the same so only one picture can be protected? Or could I for example say that 19 photographers violated the copyright of the guy who took the first photograph? Would it make a difference if the 19 photographers knew how that first picture looked like or didn't know how it looked like?

Ummm no..as stated before copyright exists at the moment of creation, 20 photogs standing in a row, could take pictures of the same subject, but they each own the copyright to "their images"..naturally there will be slight differences to each image, ie different shutter speeds, different focal lenghts, different apertures, etc..making each image unique...again argue all you want about it, if the photog has a properly licensed image, and perhaps the raw file to back up their claim( which many keep on record) you're argument would likely fail.

more later when time per mits.

205

Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread

« on: February 05, 2017, 11:19:43 AM »

The infamous "Jess L" aka Jessica Langston, aka Joel Albrizio, sure gets around..

https://www.bbb.org/boston/business-reviews/marketing-consultants/adlife-marketing-communications-company-inc-in-pawtucket-ri-186609/reviews-and-complaints

206

Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread

« on: February 04, 2017, 04:56:16 PM »

Don Knotts is a 10+ in my book!!!

207

Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread

« on: February 04, 2017, 01:55:24 PM »

unlike the rest of us, it appears April vision is improving with age...then again, April was wearing wine glasses that night in Atlanta.

208

Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread

« on: February 04, 2017, 12:53:48 PM »

I'm not so sure Ellis and Albrizio are in contact anymore, I think Linda is trying to distance herself, albeit a bit late. Considering most of the posts were in regards to Ellis stuff ( albrizio doesn't want to mention his or the adlife name ) he saw it as an opportunity to use her for his purpose, and Linda can look in the mirror to see why he's using her...she decided to comment, thus getting involved. Notice on the VOJF blog, the posts rail about her memes, about jerk-off Jolin, etc....nothing there directly relates to Albrizio or Adlife...except for the IP addresses that directly link to Adlife Marketing..

209

Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread

« on: February 04, 2017, 10:41:47 AM »

I'm determined to "not go there", but my patience and resolve will only go so far, and as you stated VOJF seems to think it's okay to "go there", and whats good for the goose is good for the gander.

I certainly don't need to and won't make stuff up, but much like I don't control "my hero members" I also don't control what others may write, post or discuss. I've spoken directly to many people in the North East / New England Area who have reached out to me with information, which I have not spoken about.. But they may very well do so on their own.

210

Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread

« on: February 04, 2017, 08:53:10 AM »

I'm not going to devote a lot of time to this either, but others might, I've heard rumblings of a "Voices of Pawtucket RI" blog, written by a concerned group of people up in that area.