Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Mulligan

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 24
226
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Heres your Saturday snicker!!
« on: July 22, 2012, 10:15:44 AM »
After listening to Timothy B. McCormack's whiny little voice on his goofy and totally phony little interview, I'm literally gasping for air to hear/see a similar self-serving video from his copyright trolling paralegal Ashanti Taylor.

Maybe Tim himself could be the interviewer?

Wow, I may have to write a little script for the interview. I'll even grant them a one time right of use of the script for only $2,349. If they want to pay me in three installments, of course there will be a $350 administrative fee.

227
Robert, this may well be the best $1.78 that has ever been spent. Talk about a bargain. Holy baloney!

228
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Seattle Times full page statement
« on: July 20, 2012, 01:29:25 PM »
Frankly, I think $8,000 for a full page weekday ad in a newspaper is a big waste of money.

Eight grand would buy a LOT of adWords and could be targeted to reach the audiences you want to read.

Other than my wife, does anyone actually read a newspaper anymore?

I'm not trying to be negative here... just expressing a point of view.

229
Damn I just cringed at that!!   :D

Good one, Robert, as the spit on my monitor attests from the loud guffaw that erupted as soon as I read this. Ha!

230
There's an interesting article in Newsweek entitled "Is the Web Driving Us Mad?" I thought of this article while reading Robert's post above about the very odd behavior of two adults.

Between copyright extortionists, endless streams of bad news, 24-7 work hours, interactive games that have no ending, and so on... I tend to agree that the web may have some dangerous consequences for many people, particularly young people who have grown up with it.

Anyway, this article makes for interesting reading at

http://www.thedailybeast.com/newsweek/2012/07/08/is-the-internet-making-us-crazy-what-the-new-research-says.html

231
We really need to stop using MF as initials for Masterfile.  When I see MF, I inevitably think of a different term.  LOL.

I rather think the MF designation is appropriate for Masterfile. When I think of the people involved in their extortion racket I consider them all to be MF-ers.

I only wish Getty Images had more "colorful" initials.

Jerry, remember that G.I. also abbreviates "G.I. Tract" in many minds.

The G.I. Tract, of course, refers to the huge cellular tube our bodies use to turn food into poop.

Getty Images does something similar with its payment extraction scheme, IMHO.

232
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: New Topic: ELI "AfterDark"
« on: July 13, 2012, 11:01:43 AM »
Move over, Garry Trudeau!

233
That was great news and excellent reading, Oscar. Thank you so much for the work that you do which enables individuals like me to stick to our convictions that these payment extraction schemes need to be stopped because they are not only morally questionable but also, in most instances, clearly illegal.

234
I'm in the U.S., but if I lived in Canada I'd do the same thing if Getty turns the matter over to an outside counsel. I would reply to one letter from that outside counsel, requesting the proof you've already requested, and I'd tell them without seeing that proof I won't be paying any money at all: If you can't provide the proof, Mr. Outside Counsel, then as far as I'm concerned the matter is closed.

If the outside counsel is the notorious copyright troll lawyer Timothy B. McCormack or his copyright trolling paralegal Ashanti A. Taylor or one of their clones, and if your experience mirrors mine, you will most likely get another letter or two.

Eventually you'll get a "final warning" letter (form letter) from the outside counsel threatening that if you don't pay up they will "recommend litigation to Getty Images."

Oh, scary. I just shit my pants.

Well, not really. I mean, by this point, their empty stupid threats are nothing but laughable, especially when they come in a form letter addressed to Attention: with no name after the Attention. Achtung!

I digress. Anyway...

Duh, I thought imminent litigation was what Getty Images was doing when they turned the matter over to their outside counsel and tripled the demand amount, still without providing a shred of proof of their right to demand any money.

But, no... turning over to outside counsel was just another empty fear ploy to get suckers to pay up because now they were being threatened by a "real" lawyer with a "real" letterhead.

Oh, scary. I just shit my pants again!

Well, not really. Actually that could have happened from the laughter that erupted on reading the "final warning" form letter but after dealing with the Getty machine for close to a year now, I have much better control over my sphincter.

I don't yet know what happens once the outside counsel recommends litigation (yeah, right, ha!) to Getty, but it'll either be more of the same or perhaps they'll put it in the automated system to send a scary letter once a month or every other month or whatever until the three year statute of limitations is over.

Or maybe they just give up, though that doesn't seem to be likely since Oscar has stated people get anywhere from six to twelve letters from these extortionists.

I think I'm at six letters at this point. I'm fully prepared to ignore (or respond to if I feel like having more fun with these ass clowns) sixty more if that's what it takes.

My bottomline: no proofie, no money!

235
As with most insurance, the policy bottomline is this:

We won't pay a dime for any claim until you've fought us for days, weeks, and months because somewhere in the fine print we'll have an out that makes you responsible for the claim and not us.

I've learned this after dealing with insurance companies for over forty years now, and I've yet to deal with a company that actually paid fully on a legitimate claim without disputing it in one degree or another.

236
If the British translation is the same as the American, it appears to me that they're telling you, "Well, we have no legal proof or legal right to demand this money that'll stand up in court so send us the money anyway because we've just made it sound like we do have the legal proof or legal right."

The nonsense about paying the photographers and what a commercial image being worth being not open to judgement is what we call bullshit in America. I'm not sure what lies and misrepresentations like this are called across the pond.

237
Ian, thanks for these links. Interesting reading, indeed.

238
I've got 2 1/2 years on the statute of limitations-- but I suspect I'll get no more letters.

You're tempting fate with that statement, Lucia! :)

239
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: My Response Letter to NCS
« on: June 25, 2012, 11:54:07 AM »
Perhaps, they're split testing schemes to determine which pattern brings in the most money...

But that would require sophisticated thinking and tracking and statistical analysis, and judging from the quality of letters coming from Getty's compliance interns and McCormack paralegals high level thinking and intelligence is not a job requirement.

Stinger, mine was Getty then McCormack. Next I expect a round from NCS... or maybe from the Vatican. They haven't tried getting the Pope involved yet...

240
This letter also opens up a new line for us to research: the state laws relating to "theft by deception" or obtaining property or money by "false pretenses."

It appears to me that Getty and McCormack seem guilty of this, but I'd like to hear what some of the rest of you think.

Below is the link to a pretty good article on Wikipedia, which begins, "Obtaining property by false pretenses is when a person obtains property by intentionally misrepresenting a past or existing fact."

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/False_pretenses

Detailed information about each state can also be found with Google.

Pages: 1 ... 14 15 [16] 17 18 ... 24
Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.