Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Robert Krausankas (BuddhaPi)

Pages: 1 ... 154 155 [156] 157 158 ... 194
2326
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Will soon receive letter from Getty
« on: January 29, 2012, 02:23:31 PM »
They ALL send letters to ANYONE regardless of what alleged infringer's online purpose is.
My site was a blog/resume thing.  I was quite sick at the time, and I was offering free work to charities on my site.
I wasn't completely unemployable, and I thought that it would be a good way to stay productive.
That didn't stop anyone.  But... yeah... I'll keep my money, thanks.

S.G.

ah  a small piece of your puzzle revealed!  :o

I hope your health is better and the sickness well behind you..

2327
Intreresting, perhaps I'll give them a call this week and inquire about their services...

Heres are the Articles of organization / Incorporation for NCS IP

http://www.sunbiz.org/pdf/10582101.pdf

the records show NCS was initially incorporated in NJ back in 2003

2003 UBR - http://www.sunbiz.org/pdf//6574117.pdf

Same address different officers and same lawfirm prepared the documents for the state.

2011 Annual Report - http://www.sunbiz.org/pdf/99127632.pdf

2328
Legal Controversies Forum / Re: Interesting development in a German Case
« on: January 28, 2012, 02:33:15 PM »
All in all, it is highly unlikely Getty would go after anyone hotlinking an image.

Didn't you recieve a letter from Getty for an image that was linked in your blog..they may not "go after" as in filing a suit, but they certainly try to go after..

Thanks for the info regarding the 9th circuit, honestly I do not know much about this...or law in general, but I'm certainly learning something just about everyday..

2329
I would definately approach them and thier news dept. about this!

2330
I've taken some time to read thru the entire complaint and the entire responce to said complaint in the of Hawaiian Art Network v. Moku-aina Properties, clearly Moku-aina are going to fight this on many levels. Below are just some of the defenses I found most interesting...

Defendants gives notice that they reserve the right to raise the defense of lack of copyright registration or fatally defective copyright registration. To the extent that the copyright registrations relied upon by Hawaiian Art Network / V.K. Tylor are inapplicable or fatally defective, this Court lacks jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action.

Defendants gives notice that they reserve the right to raise the defense that one or both of Hawaiian Art Network / V.K. Tylor lack of standing to bring the alleged claims or that Plaintiffs’ claims are otherwise non-judiciable. To the extent that  Hawaiian Art Network /  V.K. Tylor lack standing to bring the alleged claims, or the claims are otherwise non-judiciable, this Court lacks jurisdiction over such claims.

Defendants give notice that they reserve the right to raise the defenses of consent, waiver, release, abandonment, laches, acquiescence, recession, abrogation, accord and satisfaction, license, implied license, and set-off or off-set.

Defendants give notice that they reserve the right to raise the defenses of unconscionability, illegality, mistake, estoppel, copyright misuse, fraud on the Copyright Office, unclean hands, entrapment, enticement and honeypotting.

Defendants give notice that they reserve the right to raise the defense that  Hawaiian Art Network / V.K. Tylor  abandoned any copyright inhering in the subject photographs and/or that the subject photographs are in the public domain.

If Hawaiian Art Network / V.K. Tylor  were injured or damaged as alleged in the Complaint, such injuries or damages were proximately caused by acts or omissions of Hawaiian Art Network / V.K. Tylor and/or its affiliates, or others outside the control of Defendants, and not by the acts or omissions of Defendants.

Hawaiian Art Network / V.K. Tylor failed to mitigate their damages and accordingly may be barred, in whole or in part, from recovery herein.

2331
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Domains v subdomains getty letter
« on: January 27, 2012, 12:05:09 PM »
My apologies for spreading bad info, I obviously misunderstood the process the first time around. Being a hosting provider myself if I were to get a takedown notice, I would remove the offending content, as the ISP I have access to everything, whether or not they give me admin rights. Naturally i would not shut the entire site down, but rather just remove the piece in question, I would then notify my client of the take down, and go from there. This would eliminate me from having to wait for the client to take action, while at the same time preserving my safe harbor..

2332
Sorry to answer your question with questions!

Is the company overseas a "division of" or owned by Getty?

Getty owns plenty of smaller stock photo sites/companies

Have you compared prices for the same images from both companies?

I would "think" there may be a conflict if it is a totally separate entity. You could easily tell Getty you purchased or obtained the image elsewhere, and it would be upon them to prove otherwise..remember innocent until proven guilty.

Perhaps you could share a link to this overseas image?

2333
Legal Controversies Forum / Interesting development in a German Case
« on: January 27, 2012, 09:36:37 AM »
I wonder if this will effect US copyright law as it currently stand?

“Embedding” Images From Third Party Sites In Websites Is Copyright Infringement.

At least that is the case in Germany today according to the Dusseldorf Court of Appeal [8 October 2011, I-20 U 42/11].  Embedding content now appears to be copyright infringement by making the content available to the public on your website even though you have never taken and kept a copy of the image yourself and even though the image is never “physically” part of your website.  The Dusseldorf appeal court overruled the lower Court of First Instance.

http://cliffordmillerlaw.wordpress.com/2012/01/27/embedding-images-from-third-party-sites-in-websites-is-copyright-infringement/

2334
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Domains v subdomains getty letter
« on: January 27, 2012, 08:59:20 AM »
In regards to the DMCA takedowns, it would be up to the ISP to remove the image /content, then notify the user, at which time they can contest it, if they so desire..

Using ELI as an example when Matt's hosting provider got the notice, they took it down, notified Matt, and Matt fired back the counter-claim/notice, after 10-14 days if no suit is filed, the ISP puts the content back online.

DMCA is good in the respect that it really forces the person submitting the notice actually follow thru with a suit, and if they do they better have everything in order, cause then they are also open to a bogus takedown notice which can carry heavy fines/fees.

2335
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Domains v subdomains getty letter
« on: January 27, 2012, 07:05:11 AM »
Agreed, this would not matter, what matters is if the image is actually on your servers or linked to an outside source.

2336
With hosting in Switzerland and planned in Iceland, the new Righthaven promises "infrajuridsictional infrastructure" — in other words, uptime that would require international co-operation to bring down.

Through a partnership with U.S.-based first amendment lawyers Marc Randazza and Kenneth White, the new Righthaven says it will be able to vigorously defend itself in American courtrooms--and protect its clients from those who abuse laws such as the DMCA to stifle criticism.

http://boingboing.net/2012/01/23/new-righthaven-offers-hosting.html

2337
I could "maybe" understand rolling over IF information regarding the demands letters was scarce and a royal pain in the ass to research..but that is plainly not the case, I found this site literally within minutes of opening my letter, and that was nearly three years ago, the info that has been served up here since that time is truly amazing.  Not to mention the search engine exposure we get. I guess there will always be those that just can't stomach it and pay up, which is really a shame...but such is life I guess.

2338
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Will soon receive letter from Getty
« on: January 26, 2012, 02:08:58 PM »
I like the way you think SG MOST of the times, but doing this could also cause the OP to loose his domain, if it is reported for invalid whois, which just creates another problem, unless of the OP is behind a private registration.

2339
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Statute of Limitations Copyright Law
« on: January 25, 2012, 09:09:26 PM »
As a general rule, should an online business block all archiving of a site regardless of any copyright infringement issue?

Personally I am not fond of having to block the archiving of my sites OR blocking of bots based on user-agent. I don't think a company should have to spend on iota of energy "hiding." I would much rather spend my energy making sure my house is in order (in terms of copyright clearance).

I agree that it is important to have ones house in order, however as far as blocking picscout and other nasty bots comes more from a bandwidth sucking issue with me.

2340
The missing item, is if TM ever addresses the issue to begin with. The Dr. left it in their hands. As we already know these stock company's like to go after the end user/domain owner. So if TM ignored it, masterfile will still persue it...and yes if he has proof from TM as in a reciept and emails this could be problematic..

Pages: 1 ... 154 155 [156] 157 158 ... 194
Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.