Show Posts
481
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: "Voices of Jupiter Florida" Discussion Thread
« on: January 20, 2017, 06:28:53 PM »
This is Linda's response to her connection to VOJF:
http://copyright-trolls.com/2.0/the-war-of-words-and-how-low-copyright-trolls-will-go/#comment-858
Linda certainly has a right to speak out and express her dismay about us but she should know by now we are very vigorous in setting the record and context straight. She has a tendency to distort things in a very bad way. She is also very loose with the facts. She felt the need to inject herself into the VOJF thing without even researching the background of Adlife Marketing or Joel. So now, she becomes a topic of discussion dredging up shit that I was perfectly content in leaving in the past.
So, I hope she is satisfied with my public confessional on "crunt". I don't expect I will lose readership, friends, or business because of that crime against all of humanity.
That video was NEVER intended for her to view but she wants to make "a thing of it" simply because Robert was on the video listening to me rant about all her freaking shenanigans. She wants to convince others that Robert and I look like we just randomly picked her to "cyberbully" her. GMAFB. She is constantly crying about ELI people "cyberbullying" her simply because we express our dismay ABOUT her. Maybe we should peel back the last 15 years and find out from the published list of her victims (and the list April Brown maintains) who paid THOUSANDS of dollars to Linda if they felt they were "bullied" by her and Jolin. Maybe we need to do a financial estimate of how much income she generated over the years and managed to extract from people from her "legal bullying" and how it probably supported her comfortable, middle-class lifestyle.
I could go on and on and make my case very effectively and truthfully. And she can continue to cry about how she is being "cyberbullied". That is actually an insult to true victims of cyberbullies because I have actually done research on the matter.
If Linda wants to make a thing of an out-of-context rant on an episode of ELI Factor or one of my forum posts, then fine. I won't run away from it. I will explain it in very simple terms. Let's get it all out in the open and revisit the role of Betsy McBride's unprofessional behavior of not return my calls or emails in 2013, Timmy McCormack and his bullshit affidavit, John Jolin's bogus DMCA complaint, her $100,000 extortion letter, the eApps web hosting affair, etc. I have a long list.
Take for example, the court exhibits in Ellis v. Chan from 2013. She conveniently cropped out the very items that would explain the supposed "threats" against her. In fact, one can even go to the now disabled LE/LL/DP Forum to see for themselves how fucked up the court distortions were compared to the reality of it all.
http://defiantly.net/cleaning-up-the-chan-v-ellis-mess-part-2/
I made sure Judge Jordan and Betsy McBride saw what she did with her bogus exhibits when I submitted my post-appeal declaration and got it on the record. I stand by what I wrote there. Quite simply, Linda got lucky and sucker-punched me with incomplete, cropped posts. I never saw it coming with my own naivete. Linda was quite clever and sneaky I will give her that.
Bottom line, she won because I was a terrible lawyer for myself and she misled the court with her bogus, cropped, distorted, and muddied exhibits.
While I cannot speak for Betsy, I feel quite certain going forward, Betsy will more carefully vet any future clients or any claims any future client might make. And Betsy won't take shit for exhibits and embarrass herself in court. Make no mistake. It was embarrassing for Betsy and not a highlight in her career to represent Linda.
Ultimately, Linda made Betsy look like a fool by overplaying the "female victim card" against a "big bad scary man behind a keyboard" and the GA Supreme Court Justices were very tough on Betsy and Timmy.
Linda relished VOJF and decided to partake to get her jabs in. Robert and I (the two guys Linda despises the most) never believed Linda was responsible for VOJF. And both Robert and I actually DEFENDED Linda in that regard. Robert and I were UNITED in saying (behind the scenes and publicly) we did not believe Linda was behind VOJF. For us, based on our instincts and information, it all pointed to Joel (or someone in Camp Albrizio).
And honestly, Jessica/Joel essentially USED Linda's victimhood and threw her under the bus. She just didn't know it. It was convenient for Jessica/Joel to jump on Linda's victim bandwagon. And Linda played right into it.
The VOJF affair is basically a Joel vs. Robert fight but she just wanted to get in there and mix it up. Fine, let's see how many other people want to mix it up and take sides in this War of Words.
http://copyright-trolls.com/2.0/the-war-of-words-and-how-low-copyright-trolls-will-go/#comment-858
Linda certainly has a right to speak out and express her dismay about us but she should know by now we are very vigorous in setting the record and context straight. She has a tendency to distort things in a very bad way. She is also very loose with the facts. She felt the need to inject herself into the VOJF thing without even researching the background of Adlife Marketing or Joel. So now, she becomes a topic of discussion dredging up shit that I was perfectly content in leaving in the past.
So, I hope she is satisfied with my public confessional on "crunt". I don't expect I will lose readership, friends, or business because of that crime against all of humanity.
That video was NEVER intended for her to view but she wants to make "a thing of it" simply because Robert was on the video listening to me rant about all her freaking shenanigans. She wants to convince others that Robert and I look like we just randomly picked her to "cyberbully" her. GMAFB. She is constantly crying about ELI people "cyberbullying" her simply because we express our dismay ABOUT her. Maybe we should peel back the last 15 years and find out from the published list of her victims (and the list April Brown maintains) who paid THOUSANDS of dollars to Linda if they felt they were "bullied" by her and Jolin. Maybe we need to do a financial estimate of how much income she generated over the years and managed to extract from people from her "legal bullying" and how it probably supported her comfortable, middle-class lifestyle.
I could go on and on and make my case very effectively and truthfully. And she can continue to cry about how she is being "cyberbullied". That is actually an insult to true victims of cyberbullies because I have actually done research on the matter.
If Linda wants to make a thing of an out-of-context rant on an episode of ELI Factor or one of my forum posts, then fine. I won't run away from it. I will explain it in very simple terms. Let's get it all out in the open and revisit the role of Betsy McBride's unprofessional behavior of not return my calls or emails in 2013, Timmy McCormack and his bullshit affidavit, John Jolin's bogus DMCA complaint, her $100,000 extortion letter, the eApps web hosting affair, etc. I have a long list.
Take for example, the court exhibits in Ellis v. Chan from 2013. She conveniently cropped out the very items that would explain the supposed "threats" against her. In fact, one can even go to the now disabled LE/LL/DP Forum to see for themselves how fucked up the court distortions were compared to the reality of it all.
http://defiantly.net/cleaning-up-the-chan-v-ellis-mess-part-2/
I made sure Judge Jordan and Betsy McBride saw what she did with her bogus exhibits when I submitted my post-appeal declaration and got it on the record. I stand by what I wrote there. Quite simply, Linda got lucky and sucker-punched me with incomplete, cropped posts. I never saw it coming with my own naivete. Linda was quite clever and sneaky I will give her that.
Bottom line, she won because I was a terrible lawyer for myself and she misled the court with her bogus, cropped, distorted, and muddied exhibits.
While I cannot speak for Betsy, I feel quite certain going forward, Betsy will more carefully vet any future clients or any claims any future client might make. And Betsy won't take shit for exhibits and embarrass herself in court. Make no mistake. It was embarrassing for Betsy and not a highlight in her career to represent Linda.
Ultimately, Linda made Betsy look like a fool by overplaying the "female victim card" against a "big bad scary man behind a keyboard" and the GA Supreme Court Justices were very tough on Betsy and Timmy.
Linda relished VOJF and decided to partake to get her jabs in. Robert and I (the two guys Linda despises the most) never believed Linda was responsible for VOJF. And both Robert and I actually DEFENDED Linda in that regard. Robert and I were UNITED in saying (behind the scenes and publicly) we did not believe Linda was behind VOJF. For us, based on our instincts and information, it all pointed to Joel (or someone in Camp Albrizio).
And honestly, Jessica/Joel essentially USED Linda's victimhood and threw her under the bus. She just didn't know it. It was convenient for Jessica/Joel to jump on Linda's victim bandwagon. And Linda played right into it.
The VOJF affair is basically a Joel vs. Robert fight but she just wanted to get in there and mix it up. Fine, let's see how many other people want to mix it up and take sides in this War of Words.
Today Linda Ellis decided to chime and and deny involvement of the VOJF blog.. I tend to believe her for the most part, however, it was of her own choice to comment those couple of times, it was her own choice to re-upload the "crunt" video to her OWN youtube channel. Thus it's on her shoulders for injecting herself into this charade..
She continues to twist facts in regards to the video...Matthew has "confessed" to saying "crunt" and coming up with the word.. nowhere on that video do I utter that word, I only "giggle like a 13 yr old".
She also alludes that i spend hours upon hours creating memes, truth of the matter is, I have lots of better things to do with my time, those memes take less than 2 minutes to create, or roughly as long as it takes her to churn out some cheesy inspirational quote.
http://copyright-trolls.com/2.0/the-war-of-words-and-how-low-copyright-trolls-will-go/
