Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Matthew Chan

Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 154
511
It is actually pretty disgusting and goes WAY BEYOND anything anyone has ever seen. Once people know the sordid details, I think it will catch people's attention.

512
Allow me to add to Greg's comments that Robert has worked tirelessly for years without compensation volunteering his time and knowledge when Oscar and I were not on these forums during the early years. What makes Robert distinctive is he is actually a great photographer and understands the "other side".

I want to say that if I had not "forced" Robert to take credit for all the work, reporting, and unglamorous thankless back-end work he did here, today he would still be known as Buddhapi (not Robert) and no one would know his true name. Robert is unpretentious and doesn't try to be someone he isn't. To me, that counts for something.

It takes courage to post under your own full name here. Very few do it. The people who post with their real names here do it by choice backed by their personal and professional reputations.

We don't want anyone's money here. We just want legitimate, kind and truthful words of gratitude if Robert did something or contributed in a way that helped you or your situation. We prefer you use your real name but if that is not possible, Greg will accept your alias. Just be real just as the rest of the ELI team has been real with our commentary and knowledge.

Unlike certain people, we don't have to stoop to fake comments, fake email personas, fake news, and fake controversy.

To give comfort to everyone, Oscar Michelen is leading the charge and personally representing Robert Krausankas in this disgusting and fake anti-smear campaign. Oscar will be releasing a statement in support of Robert.

ELI has been a foundation for nearly 9 years helping many victims get educated and stand up against so many copyright extortionists. Robert has been there for most of those 9 years with Oscar and I.

513
ELI Friend/Team Member Greg Troy of CABALaw.org broke news of the latest development regarding Adlife Marketing & Communications and its termination contract with LSA Creative Outlet effective March 1, 2017. Read his thoughts and analysis of this latest news.

http://copyrightantibullyingact.org/site/why-is-adlife-marketing-pulling-its-images-from-lsa/

The recent announcement by LSA Creative Outlet has issued an announcement and warning on their website:

http://www.creativeoutlet.com/foodphotography/#name=homePage&event=render

Special Message for Food Photography Users

We’re writing to inform you of an important change to your Creative Outlet services account. Adlife Marketing & Communications, the supplier of one of our food photography realms, has terminated their provider contract with LSA (formerly MultiAd/AdBuilder) effective March 1, 2017. This means that, after February 28, 2017, you will no longer have the right to use any of the Adlife collections and our Creative Outlet subscription, Food Photography.

We apologize for any inconvenience this may cause, but rest assured, Creative Outlet is still able to fulfill your food photography needs. We have arranged to provide you access to our high quality Food Images collection. In order to facilitate your transition to this new product, we will provide you access to the Food Images product at no additional charge beginning January 1, 2017. Beginning March 1, 2017, this new collection will be available to you under your current subscription at the same price you were paying for the Food Photography realm.

Because you will have no further rights to use Adlife Food Photography content in any media (online and print) after February 28, 2017, we strongly suggest that you take appropriate steps to ensure that you will not inadvertently use these images after that date. Doing so may subject you to copyright infringement claims by Adlife Marketing & Communications.

We look forward to continuing to provide you high quality images to meet your marketing needs. We have a dedicated team of support representatives to assist you in this transition. If you have any questions or concerns, feel free to contact a member of our team.

Sincerely,

LSA Creative Outlet Team



It appears that LSA Creative Outlet is trying to minimize any potential blowback against its customers by giving existing customers time to get out of the Adlife images. That is a pretty nice thing for them to do given how aggressive Adlife is with their $8,000 extortion letters. I would tell every LSA Creative Outlet customer to DUMP the images YESTERDAY if they want to avoid some drama in their lives.

514
Kind of amusing.  When someone does a Google search on "Cabinet Bouchara Avocats letter", it points to ELI, Hacker Factor, and Zyra as the leading sources referring to it.

It is ELI vs. Hacker Factor to fight for the higher spot on Google. :-)

Anyone who gets of these obnoxious French letters will get the low-down pretty quickly.

515
Debt collection agencies have strict rules to follow. I suggest you contact the debt collection agency and let them know this is NOT a debt. Because debt collection agencies can report what they believe is debt to credit agencies. I don't think people need that additional grief.

And if they won't relent, then you might have to report the debt collection agency itself. Go google it, there are websites that will direct to the correct agency.

516
Getty Images Letter Forum / Re: Happy New Year!
« on: January 06, 2017, 11:53:47 PM »
Thank you, Cam! Same to you, albeit a bit late!  ;-)

517
Okay, it seems the Cabinet Bounchara Avocats / Vanessa Bouchara / Getty Images Censorship & Gag Letters have become a thing. I thought I was alone but there are people who are coming out on this.

So far,

1. Yours truly, has received two letters for two websites, this one (ELI), and TurnKeyPublisher.com.
http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/forum/getty-images-letter-forum/getty-images-(cabinet-bouchara-avocats)-attempts-to-intimidate-eli-to-kill-links/

2. Blogger & Expert Copywriter Ryan Healy (Great guy and very smart!) of RyanHealy.com

3. Dr. Neal Krawetz of HackerFactor.com
http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?url=archives/747-Cease-and-Desist-from-Getty-Images-in-France.html

4. Zyra.info http://www.zyra.info/getstu.htm He has already removed his content.

If there are any other bloggers or website owners who have received these letters, I want to know about it. I want to find out how many of these letters are being sent out and who is being sent the letters. I will honor all requests for confidentiality but I think you are stronger if you are part of a visible united group especially if you are a blogger or website owner in the U.S.

You should know I will be contacting other bloggers and media websites that cover stories such as this one. If you are willing to be interviewed, let me know that as well so I can direct reporters/bloggers to contact you directly should they be interested in doing so.

My guess is there might be 20 to 30 of these letters sent out to the most prominent critics listed in Google search engines, and not the hundreds in the case of typical Getty Images extortion letters.

Right now, I think there is just a small group of us but it is hard to gauge at this early juncture. So, anyone that wants to help sniff this out by Googling or Binging, please do so.

There is something very sleazy and dirty about trying to censor and gag bloggers and commenters for criticizing and offering suggestions regarding Getty Images extortion letters.  Yes, I am using the colloquial term, extortion letters, as we have done for the last 8.5 years and will continue to do so.

Vanessa Bouchara, no way you are going to gag and silence everyone who wants to call Getty Images Demand Letters "extortion letters". You can't forbid people from saying negative things and stop people from suggesting they shouldn't pay or ignore the letters. Most of us are in the U.S. and we are allowed to say these things.  French lawyers might not understand this but we have two important things:  First Amendment and Section 230 CDA.  Start reading up on it.



518
Below is the text version of the cease and desist letter French lawyer, Vanessa Bouchara, sent to me regarding my other website, TurnKeyPublisher.com. Please note that there are several typos and misspellings in Vanessa's letter. https://www.scribd.com/document/335891075/Getty-Images-France-Cease-Desist-Letter-to-TurnKeyPublisher

=================
Cabinet Bouchara Avocats
Specialistes en Droit de la Propriete Intellectuelle

Matthew Chan
P.O Box XXXX
Columbus, GA, 31917
UNITED STATES


Paris. December 23th, 2016

By Registered Letter: RK 141308160 FR

Cease and desist letter

Subject : GETTY IMAGES / TURNKEYPUBLISHER.COM


Sir,

I am the legal adviser of the company GETTY IMAGES.
The company GETTY IMAGES is the biggest global database. Its main activity is the supply. development and worldwide distribution of online images. videos and music under which many communication professionals made use.

Indeed. it enjoys an established reputation both domestically and internationally.

However. my client found many comments which seriously jeopardize its practice on your web site www.turnkeypublisher.com. and more precisely at the following addresses:

http://turnkeypublisher.com/tag/getty-images-extortion-letter/
http://turnkeypublisher.com/2008/07/08/ibpa-independent-book-publishers-association-turns-blind-eye-to-getty-images-settlement-demand-letter/
http://turnkeypublisher.com/2008/06/17/i-received-a-getty-images-settlement-demand-letter/

Indeed, the combination of the words << GETTY IMAGES >> and << extortion >> on the search engine Google bring us directly to your web site.

Furthermore. the regularity of the methods and of the proceedings used by our client had also been questioned. it have been accused to send "threatening letter", "extortion letter".

Please find bellow some of the litigious statements:

Quote
Getty Images extortion letter

Copyrights
IBPA, Independent Book Publishers Association Turns Blind Eye to Getty Images Settlement Demand Letter
July 8, 2008 Matthew Chan

"I have been in contact twice with Terry Nathan, Executive Director of IBPA, Independent Book Publishers Association regarding the Getty Images Settlement Demand Letter. As a disclaimer, my publishing firm (Ascend Beyond Publishing) is a...]"

Copyrights
My Getty Images Settlement Demand Letter
June 17, 2008 Matthew Chan
"This post was first published on the MatthewChan.com website. =========
Today, I received a Getty Images Settlement Demand Letter basically trying to extort from me a payment of $1,300 for a bird image that was...]"

IBPA, Independent Book Publishers Association Turns Blind Eye to Getty Images Settlement Demand Letter
July 8. 2008 Matthew Chan Copyrights, Getty Images, Legal Affairs
"Because of this membership profile, I felt it was highly likely someone in its membership would one day receive a Getty Images Settlement Demand Letter like I did. Most people receiving this letter uninformed and unwarned, would be intimidated by this letter. "

My Getty Images Settlement Demand Letter
June 17. 2008 Matthew Chan Copyrights, Getty Images, Legal Affairs
"Today, I received a Getty Images Settlement Demand Letter basically trying to extort from me a payment of $1,300 for a bird image that was used on theintrepidway.com website. If I pay that amount, basically they agree not to sue me or my company. However, suing and winning are two entirely different issues. "

"Unsuspecting U.S. website owners who want to improve the appear of their websites buy these web templates and graphics and use them on their websites. However, months and years later, Getty Images sends this very nasty and threatening letter out essentially holding you fully responsible even if someone else did the crime. I understand that employers are held responsible for many issues, however, what comes is on the verge of insanity and certainly not even close to reasonable.

If you are legally uninformed, I will tell you, it is a very intimidating letter unless yOU think this through carefully. After I calmed down, I took the time to do a Google and Yahoo search on "Getty Images Settlement Demand Letter". I think if you do the same, you will get a very interesting education. It is actually devious because Getty Images do not do anyone the courtesy of a Cease and Desist Letter. Basically, let people know that they did the wrong thing and allow them to correct the situation before you get nasty.

However, in one mailing, they ask you to remove all the infringing images AND ask you to pay this extortionistic amount so they won't sue you. What a great scam. Start sending letters to anyone who made a mistake to correct the mistake but also demand a huge cash payment while you are at it in exchange for you to NOT sue them. What a great way to make money. Why bother going to court when you can simply instill the fear of a lawsuit into people?"

"I felt the need to post this warning message to warn others. There are many, many angry people who have received similar letters from Getty's Images. I suspect they will want one more web source to consult and discuss this situation."

Those acts of gross disparagement seriously damage GETTY IMAGES' image.

This article discredits the services offered by my client. Moreover, it calls into question its seriousness and honesty by accusing it, in a totally unfunded manner, to be the author of dubious proceedings.

According to a judgment given by the Commercial Division of the French Supreme Court on the 15th of December 2009, disparagement is to discredit someone by spreading criticisms and malicious information about it or its business methods.

Moreover, on the 5th of June 2002, the Paris District Court ruled that interactions between web users on discussion forums which comments obviously contain fraud imputations and questionable practices exceed the limits of the liberty of expression. Indeed, it reaches denigration which impair the honor and do not respect the dignity to whom it is directed.

Thus, as the registrant of the web site, you are responsible for the information disclosed on it, notably regarding their reliability, veracity or completeness.

Under the judgment given by the First Civil Division of the French Supreme Court on the 5th of July 2006, you shall observed the most elementary prudence concerning the content of the comments disclosed.

Yet, in this case, those statements have undeniably exceeded the right to criticize.

Furthermore, those statements incite to violate GETTY IMAGES' rights, which is particularly intolerable.

Indeed, it is suggested to web users to deny their legal obligations toward my client. They are being discouraged from answering her letters of formal notice and from paying the sums due for the reproduction of an image owned by my client without its approval.

Besides, in the comments attached to the article, you also discuss the strategies and tactics allowing the violation of my client's rights with impunity.

Please find bellow some of the litigious statements:

Quote
Matthew Chan
October 1, 2008 at 1 :59 pm
"You can read about the actions I took at http://extortionletterinfo.com. lt has detailed reports and information for anyone who received a Getty Images Letter."

Indeed, on the 12th of July 2012, the Fist Civil Division of the French Supreme Court ruled that the incitement of criminal act is reprehensible.

As a result you shall withdraw every indication disparaging my client on your website.

If you do not comply with this letter of formal notice within 8 days from the date of its receipt and, in any case, before the 30th of December, I had been instructed to initiate all appropriate action against you.

We truly hope we will not go that far, and that we will quickly manage to settle this matter.

Pursuant to our professional rules, we are available to discuss this case with your usual adviser.

Yours sincerely,

Vanessa Bouchoura

519
Below is the text version of the cease and desist letter French lawyer, Vanessa Bounchara, sent to me regarding ELI.  Please note that there are several typos and misspellings in Vanessa's letter. https://www.scribd.com/document/335891005/Getty-Images-France-Cease-Desist-Letter-to-ELI

================
Cabinet Bouchara Avocats
Specialistes en Droit de la Propriete Intellectuelle

ELI Complaints
Monsieur Matthew Chan
P.O. Box XXXX
Columbus, GA 31917
United States


Paris, December 19th, 2016

By Registered Letter : RK 00 128 367 4 FR

Cease and desist letter

Subject: GETIY IMAGES / EXTORSIONLETTERINFO.COM (sic)


Sir,

I am the legal adviser of the company GETTY IMAGES.

The company GETTY IMAGES is the biggest global database. Its main activity is the supply, development and worldwide distribution of online images, videos and music under which many communication professionals made use.

Indeed, it enjoys an established reputation both domestically and internationally.

However, my client found many comments which seriously jeopardize its practice on your web site www.extortionletterinfo.com. and more precisely at the following addresses:

http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/
http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/how-to-get-help-with-your-extortion-letter/
http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/eli-phone-support-call-with-matthew-chan/
http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/attorney-oscar-michelen-explains-his-getty-images-defense-letter-program/
http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/2012-update-expansion-of-attorney-oscar-michelens-defense-letter-program/

Indeed, the combination of the words « GETTY IMAGES » and « extortion » or «arnaque» (fraud) on the search engine Google bring us directly to your web site.

Furthermore, the regularity of the methods and of the proceedings used by our client had also been questioned, which have been described as « legalized extortion» and « Extortion Letter Scheme ».

Please find bellow some of the litigious statements:

Quote
Welcome to ExtortionLetterlnfo.com (ELI) Mission Statement

"ExtortionLetterlnfo.com (ELI) is dedicated to reporting information and providing commentary on Getty Images (and other stock photo) Settlement Demand Letters. ELI is a privately-owned and privately-managed website. Every effort is made to provide factual information and professional opinions regarding Getty Images' (and the respective companies) "practice" of issuing "Settlement Letters" that we consider "legalized extortion".

As Lead Contributors of this website, we believe what they are doing is technically legal but ethically and morally questionable. "The Letter" bullies and preys upon the legal ignorance of the letter recipients. This website attempts to discover, report, and comment on the facts in a civil and orderly way. This website also provides assistance in defending unaware and unintended victims of this Letter. "

Why is This Being Called "Legalized Extortion" and an "Extortion Letter Scheme"?

"This is a descriptive and colloquial term for Getty Images' deliberate, malicious, bullying, and presumptuous letter campaign that engages in what is tantamount to legalized extortion. The letter in its entirety is both well-worded and well-constructed. It has been clearly been well thought out. Because of the deliberate construction and planning that goes into this letter campaign, it qualifies as a Scheme.

The Letter automatically presumes guilt of the recipient. The letter recipient is expected to provide proof of their innocence. In effect, the letter recipient is presumed guilty unless they prove their innocence.

Although the letter does provide for the possibility that the letter recipient was unaware and unintended of the alleged infringement, the Letter takes a heavy-handed and unforgiving approach of stating that they are responsible for all alleged "damages and liability". The Letter automatically presumes Getty Images has been "damaged" whether or not that is actually true or proven.

Because this scheme relies heavily on the letter recipients ignorance of due legal process and people's inherent fear of legal conflict as a result of that ignorance, it is considered by many as legalized extortion.

Given the overall assessment of the situation, the term "legalized extortion" was coined to better describe Getty Images very aggressive letter campaign."

How to Get Help With Your Extortion Letter
October 29. 2016 Matthew Chan ELI Premium Support, General

"Since 2008, we've had thousands of readers discover the ELI website and ELI Forums after they have received a Getty Images, Masterfi/e, Corbis, or some other stock photo agency's or photographer's "extortion letter". Over the years, many have attempted to contact us through phone and email asking for help. Early on, we tried to help but eventually there were just too many requests for help and the help being requested overstepped reasonable time boundaries. So, we are unable to provide free one-on-one help. However, we have provided several help and support options. If you get an extortion letter, this is what you need to do:

1. The very first thing you need to do is to CALM DOWN and TAKE A BREATH! Tens of thousands of these extortion letters have gone out over the years. You are far from being alone. Getting an extortion letter from out of the blue is upsetting but not the end of the world. Your credit will not be ruined, you will not have to file for bankruptcy, and (most of the time) you won't be sued. For most people and their Situation, the bark is much worse than the bite.

2. This is one is a no-brainer. You should immediately remove ALL copies of the allegedly infringing images from your web server. Even the "hidden" ones. If it is anywhere on your web server, you are at risk. Also, if you have other images you don't have receipts for or authorization to use, you should remove those as a precautionary measure. If you can get one extortion letter, you get more. And unfortunately, we know plenty of people who have received a few extortion letters."

ELI Phone Support Call with Matthew Chan
October 29, 2016 Matthew Chan ELI Premium Support

"Some of the more notorious copyright extortionists and settlement demand letters I have personally researched, reported, and consulted on include:

Getty Images
Picscout
License Compliance Services (LCS)
Masterfile
Corbis
Vincent K. Tylor / J. Stephen Street
Photo Attorney / Leslie Burns / Carolyn Wright
BWP Media / Sanders Law
Higbee & Associates (Mathew Higbee)
Adlife Marketing & Communications
DeBoer IP
Image Rights International
Woolf, Gafni & Cirlin
Linda Ellis / Linda's Lyrics / John W. Jolin (Dash Poem) ."

Update & Expansion of Attorney Oscar Michelen's Defense Letter Program
October 29, 2016 Matthew Chan ELI Premium Support, General

"One of the ongoing goals of the Defense Letter Program is to efficiently serve many people as cost-effectively as possible. Because of Oscar's extensive experience gained from the last 8 years of representing stock photo extortion letter clients, I am happy to announce, on Oscar's behalf, the Expansion of the no-frills Defense Letter Program to include legal representation against the following extortion letters:

• Getty Images Settlement Demand Letters
• Picscout Settlement Demand Letters
• License Compliance Services (LCS) Settlement Demand Letters
• Masterfile Settlement Demand Letters
• Photo Attorney Settlement Demand Letters
• Superstock Settlement Demand Letters
• Corbis Settlement Demand Letters
• Vincent K. Tylor Settlement Demand Letters
• Hawaiian Art Network Settlement Demand Letters
• Linda's Lyrics (Dash Poem) Settlement Demand Letters
• Sanders Law Settlement Demand Letters
• DeBoer IP Settlement Demand Letters
• Adlife Marketing & Communications Settlement Demand Letters
Image Rights Settlement Demand Letters
• And many others ."

According to the judgment given by the First Civil Division of the French Supreme Court on the 12th of July 2012, this is particularly intolerable and reprehensible.

Those acts of gross disparagement seriously damage GETTY IMAGES' image.

This article discredits the services offered by my client. Moreover, it calls into question its seriousness and honesty by accusing it, in a totally unfunded manner, to be the author of dubious proceedings.

According to a judgment given by the Commercial Division of the French Supreme Court on the 15th of December 2009, disparagement is to discredit someone by spreading criticisms and malicious information about it or its business methods.

Moreover, on the 5th of June 2002, the Paris District Court ruled that interactions between web users on discussion forums which comments obviously contain fraud imputations and questionable practices exceed the limits of the liberty of expression. Indeed, it reaches denigration which impair the honor and do not respect the dignity to whom it is directed.

Thus, as the registrant of the web site in question, you are responsible for the information disclosed on it, notably regarding their reliability, veracity or completeness,

Under the judgment given by the First Civil Division of the French Supreme Court on the 5th of July 2006, you shall observed the most elementary prudence concerning the content of the comments disclosed.

Yet, in this case, those statements have undeniably exceeded the right to criticize.

Furthermore, those statements incite to violate GETTY IMAGES' rights, which is particularly intolerable.

As a result you shall withdraw every indication disparaging my client on your website.

If you do not comply with this letter of formal notice within 8 days from the date of its receipt and , in any case, before the 27th of December, I had been instructed to initiate all appropriate action against you.

We truly hope we will not go that far, and that we will quickly manage to settle this matter.

Pursuant to our professional rules, we are available to discuss this case with your usual adviser.

Yours sincerely,

Vanessa Bouchoura

520
I commend Neal for his efforts but I think he partially fell into a rabbit hole with his extremely lengthy response. He obviously took a lot of time to write it. And if I thought this was actually a serious matter, I would too.

People need to understand that this is mostly a mind-fuck by Getty Images or Vanessa until you sit down and seriously think this through. It will be released next week.

As I said, I have drafted my response but it needs to be read over and edited by another person. Once that is done, I think letter recipients will understand where I am coming from.

And if not, then everyone gets to respond in their own way. I prefer simplicity and conciseness when it's appropriate. And at this juncture, that is the way I am going.

Well done, Dr. Neal Krawetz.  I think ELI should reach out to him and offer him some sort of recognition for his efforts.  At least a major bit of promotion for his response letter.

I think Getty and their "French" lawyers should also be put under the spotlight.

521
I read Dr. Neal Krawetz's response and it is way longer than the response I drafted for myself.  Personally, I think he wrote way too much when the issue is much simpler.  Mine is a one-page response with a number of pointed questions to cut to the heart of the matter. The rest of it is noise as far as I am concerned.

How in the hell does French law take precedent over U.S. laws and the First Amendment when the letter recipients live and work in the U.S., write for primarily American readership, and web-hosted in the U.S.?

No U.S. lawyer will be able to fluently discuss French law. That is going down a rabbit hole. They will probably tell you French courts has no jurisdiction over U.S. citizens that live and operate in the U.S. and have no business interests in France. The fact that French citizens can read an American website is not a basis of real jurisdiction in France.

All the other phrases and French case law they use of "disparagement", "inciting", "litigious", is all smoke and mirrors as far as I am concerned.

If Getty Images has a problem with what any U.S. blogger wrote, than they need to hire a U.S. lawyer and quote U.S. case law to address the issue. It is going to take a lot more than some random blonde female French lawyer working at a French law firm to convince me the B.S. she is feeding me is actually true and relevant.

If everyone getting this letter will hold their horses a bit and not get overly twisted up about this, I will happily post my response to Vanessa, the French lawyer, next week.

So... a few updates.

1. I have republished all three of the articles I wrote about Getty.

2. I have scheduled a 30-minute consultation with my attorney Wednesday morning.

3. Dr. Neal Krawetz and I both received French Cease and Desist letters almost the same day. Both letters use large portions of the same exact verbiage. You can read his very thorough and well-written response here:

http://www.hackerfactor.com/blog/index.php?url=archives/747-Cease-and-Desist-from-Getty-Images-in-France.html

522
2017 is off to a lively start for ELI.  I got back into town last night and saw a notification of certified letters waiting for me. I knew one letter was ELI-related because it was being addressed to "ELI Complaints" but it was from France which I thought was very interesting. I was going to NOT sign it but my curiosity got the better of me. I thought it might have been from some obscure French stock photo agency complaining about something a user wrote. It wasn't. It is supposedly from Getty Images.

However, the letter written by French lawyer, Vanessa Bouchara of Cabinet Bouchara Avocats: http://en.cabinetbouchara.com/vanessa-bouchara.html

The two cease and desist letters that were sent to me are here:
https://www.scribd.com/document/335891005/Getty-Images-France-Cease-Desist-Letter-to-ELI
https://www.scribd.com/document/335891075/Getty-Images-France-Cease-Desist-Letter-to-TurnKeyPublisher

The letter directed at ELI objects to these ELI links:
http://www.extortionletterinfo.com
http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/how-to-get-help-with-your-extortion-letter/
http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/eli-phone-support-call-with-matthew-chan/
http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/attorney-oscar-michelen-explains-his-getty-images-defense-letter-program/
http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/2012-update-expansion-of-attorney-oscar-michelens-defense-letter-program/

The letter directed at TurnKeyPublisher.com objects to these following links:
http://turnkeypublisher.com/tag/getty-images-extortion-letter/
http://turnkeypublisher.com/2008/07/08/ibpa-independent-book-publishers-association-turns-blind-eye-to-getty-images-settlement-demand-letter/
http://turnkeypublisher.com/2008/06/17/i-received-a-getty-images-settlement-demand-letter/

These are older, outdated links from 2008 prior to my formally launching ELI but apparently Vanessa Bouchara and Getty Images has a problem with them.

A response is forthcoming and I will be writing it myself. But let me give you a clue as to what I think.  This is probably the most ridiculous piece of shit legal threat letter I have read in a LONG time. 

I have to get this straight because I am having mental challenges over this matter. We have a huge American stock photo company known for sending thousands of extortion letters in the last 10 years infamously using legal intimidation tactics and now they have hired a French lawyer from a French law firm, quoting French laws, and threatening to use the French legal system against an American citizen living and operating an American website in the U.S. whose readership is primarily directed to American readers. Did I get that right?

Am I to understand that American laws like the First Amendment and other free speech laws have suddenly become subservient to French laws because French lawyer, Vanessa Bouchara of Cabinet Bouchara Avocats says so? Ummmm... No, I don't believe so.

These letters are so nonsensical, pathetic, and desperate, it barely deserves a response. But I will eventually formulate a response and I will post it for everyone to read next week.

The fact these letters are going out to bloggers, commenters, and critics is a sign someone is pretty desperate and that the collective criticisms throughout the Internet seem to be taking a toll on their efforts.

Blogger Ryan Healy is apparently the first person to post on ELI about it. I didn't even know he posted until Robert Krausankas told me about his post. http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/forum/getty-images-letter-forum/a-new-getty-problem-cease-desist-letter-from-france/

523
I got mine today from Getty Images France. You can bet I will be posting my letter for everyone to see and I have a few special friends that will be VERY interested in this.

524
Yes, I received the submission. I will look into this further after the holidays.

525
Are you complaining it is too quiet? No, I don't think your file is closed. I am quite confident they will revive their efforts to communicate, if you give them a reason to do so. In any case, your file could be "escalated" and then you will have your answer if your file was closed or not.

There is a 3-year statute of limitations. So set your calendar by that. And Silence is golden.

So, as you can see from the old dates on this thread, it's been about 9 months since I've heard from LCS. In a nutshell, I received an LCS letter in Nov. 2015 for a single image, responded once asking for lots of add'l detail per these forums, got a flimsy response many weeks later, and then I sent a final response in April 2016 telling them that: 1. they didn't answer my questions, 2. they only responded to me via email (not snail mail as well), 3. their response looked like spam and had several grammatical mistakes, 4. to close my file and that I'd be filing complaints with the BBB and attorney general of WA. To date, I haven't heard bupkus from LCS. Is that long of a delayed response normal from LCS, or is there a chance they closed my file? I haven't clicked on the link to make a payment via the LCS website in fear that they monitor those clicks and perhaps it could trigger a response from them (perhaps that's an overblown fear). Anyone experience a long delay like this? Is clicking on their payment link to see if it still open a big deal? As always, thank you for your wisdom.

Pages: 1 ... 33 34 [35] 36 37 ... 154
Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.