Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Matthew Chan

Pages: 1 ... 55 56 [57] 58 59 ... 154
841
Out of most of the copyright enforcers, I find Carolyn Wright to be among the most respectable.  I know that isn't saying much but I would give her more respect than most of the other losers in the business because she is actually passionate about her photography.  She lives and breathes it artistically and professionally. 

I absolutely disagree with the crazy amounts she puts into her extortion letters. That is my beef with her.  Her letters are misleading and heavy-handed but she does not strike me as being as stupid and sloppy as Getty. She is much smarter than the Getty idiots and she handpicks her clients. As far as I am concerned, she is just in the wrong business. Under any other circumstances (and I cannot believe I am saying this publicly), I almost find her likeable. I actually like her photography and find value in them unlike some other crap I see.

You can be suspect of whether her numbers and whether she will sue.  But I would NOT be suspect that the person she represents is the actual copyright holder of the image being claimed.

You seriously need to develop the ability to understand the finer distinctions of what we are explaining to you.

Oh, and I see he knows Carolyn Wright aka Photoattorney.  He was mentioned in her blog.  So clearly there is something underhanded at work here.

842
Let us assume that it was stolen from Lik. If you know it was stolen from someone why would you INTENTIONALLY copy it?  Is it your rationale that because someone claimed it from Lik, that you should do likewise?

The issue we have on ELI is largely the disproportionate amounts of money being asked and the way it is being extorted from smaller parties.  But we tell EVERYONE take down the damned image and don't use it.  It seems like you are FIGHTING TO USE it, justifying it because SOMEONE ELSE allegedly copied it.

You say the photo isn't worth much, then give it up. ELI gets enough of a bad rap that we condone copyright infringement. We don't.  We also have no love for Getty, Photo Attorney, and the other copyright thugs but you are being foolishly blatant and ignorant thinking we will support your rationale.

The photographer has a right to claim his work and insist others don't use it without his permission or compensation.  You were notified about the possible infringement but you are still going to use the image under the pretext that since someone else copied the image, you will too?

Yikes, is what I say.

Lets get some facts straight here.  The image is this one:
http://500px.com/photo/1707910/japanese-garden-by-tom-schwabel

And I think you will find he's stolen it from Lik and seeded it all over the net.  It's on BoredPanda and like 1000 other sites.

I know I'm right.  That dickhead photographer is the one who is morally bankrupt here.

843
Yes, this is very real and unbelievable. She goes on to the show knowing she will be naked on national TV but she is upset because of a brief second that her vagina and anus is showing.

http://nypost.com/2014/08/20/dating-naked-cast-member-sues-after-crotch-blur-fail/

http://insidetv.ew.com/2014/08/21/dating-naked-lawsuit/

The alleged non-blurring can be shown here.

http://ohnotheydidnt.livejournal.com/90556128.html


Pages: 1 ... 55 56 [57] 58 59 ... 154
Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.