Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - KWR

Pages: [1]
1
So I received a response from Getty and in their response they seem to have some boiler plate responses... anyone have any comments on how they handled these?

Please understand that, as exclusive licensor of the images in question, Getty Images is seeking compensation for the unauthorized usage of our represented photographers work. Getty Images’ responsibility to its represented photographers is not only to appropriately license the use of their images to its customers, but to also protect its represented photographer’s intellectual property from unauthorized use and to maintain the exclusive availability of the image through Getty Images.

Below are excerpts from their response:
 
With respect to your comment requesting that we provide proof of Getty Image’s right to manage the images; while this request would seem to be redundant because you have already apparently read the terms and conditions associated with the use of our represented photographers’ work; the author of a work has the right to transfer his exclusive rights to another party.  17 U.S.C. §101.  Those exclusive rights include the ability to license the material, grant permission for its, use and the ability to make and defend claims.  17 U.S.C. §106, 106A.  The authors of these images are the photographers. Getty Images contractually represents the photographers who created these images.  This representation includes the privilege to license their intellectual property and the obligation to protect it from unauthorized use.  Due to confidentiality concerns, we cannot provide you with copies of our contributor contracts, nor are we required to provide them prior to formal discovery requests.

Getty Images does not require its represented photographers to register their works with the US Copyright Office. Copyright exists upon the moment of creation.  Registration is not a requirement of copyright law and only an issue at the time a lawsuit is filed or if statutory damages are being sought.  Getty Images is currently attempting to resolve this matter without litigation and is not seeking statutory damages.  Accordingly, the registration certificate is irrelevant at this time.  The fact remains that the imagery was in use without the proper license and Getty Images continues to seek compensation for the prior unauthorized use. Please find enclosed a watermarked copy of the imagery as evidence of our rights in the same. Therefore, when copyright infringement occurs, Getty Images is entitled to compensation. We are aware of our obligations under the law and civil procedure requirements in filing formal proceedings. Assuming arguendo, registrations are not in place, which is not admitted, nothing prohibits us from obtaining an expedited registration prior to filing suit.

2
Getty Images Letter Forum / GI Letter and 30 day preview agreement
« on: May 09, 2012, 05:53:34 PM »
I've received my own GI demand letter and I couldn't find anything that references my situation exactly so I thought I would post if for some insight. Last year I decided to launch a website for my 17 year hobby which is now a single member LLC.  As a registered user  of GI you get non-watermarked versions of their catalog they call "Comps" or "Previews" and where you download the comp image there is a smaller print link to review the licensing agreement for "comps" and "previews". In that agreement, it clearly states you are granted a 30 day non-transferable, non-commercial, license. It goes on to indicate that using it over the 30 days you will be invoiced $150 per image. (I'm assuming they came up with that number because the images are lower res than the higher res you would pay for, even in the small format). So I read their agreement, put two of their images into my CMS for sizing and effects testing but after 30 days of that revision took most of the site down for retooling, including the pages they sent me as a screen capture. What Happened?? Apparently, while my Flash admin panel (my site is 100% flash) blocks humans from the pages making them non-public and making me feel I was following their policy... it is not immune to Pic Scout.  Really erks me as an IP creator being accused of the this, but has anybody pushed back on GI because of their comp agreement?

I can tell from the screen shots they sent along with this demand letter it was during the my 30 day window, yet proving that to them is going to be tough because  you don't have a transaction when you download a comp. So as far as they know I had it on the site for years or hours when Pic Scout scanned my site.  What do you think about this "comp" licensing agreement they have and does it apply?
 
Kris

Pages: [1]
Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.