Click Official ELI Links
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support | ELI Legal Representation Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - mph_mtc

Pages: [1]
1
Hi there,

Just wanted to update you on my on-going saga...And ask for any comments or opinions....

My original post is here --> http://www.extortionletterinfo.com/forum/getty-images-letter-forum/preparation-for-'next-round-of-extortion'/

I responded to NCS IP with a registered letter stating that because there was no order against me, that Getty merely had a 'claim' against me, and because it was only a claim, it was not a debt, and I asked that NCS IP not contact me again.

So, today, I receive this in my email (note when reading the following - I have never emailed them - the only contact I've had with them, is me sending them a registered letter - I've also added a comment in RED).


Thank you for your email.  In reviewing the notes I see that Getty Images already advised you that they would not provide the registrations pre trial.  The copyright registrations would be available at the time of litigation, these articles would typically be furnished when compelled by the court through the course of discovery, should a matter like this go to legal proceedings.  The burden of proof lies with your company to show licensed use of the images in question. Getty Images asserts that their represented photographers own all copyrights related to the images at issue. This image is available for license exclusively on the Getty Images website. Therefore, if Getty Images did not grant a license for use, the unauthorized use is treated as copyright infringement.
 
While Getty appreciates that you have removed the Getty Images imagery that was used on your commercial  website, but that does not close the matter as Getty has a contractual obligation to its artists to obtain license fees in exchange for the use of the image that have been assigned to Getty Images.   We also hope that you understand that Getty's artists rely on receiving compensation for the use of their works for their livelihood.  The artist who created this image cannot make a living unless they get paid for their work and rampant copyright infringement makes it very difficult for the artists to continue to earn their livelihood from their work.
 
Notwithstanding the foregoing and in an attempt to settle this matter amicably without the necessity, risk and expense of litigation, Getty Images is willing to settle this matter for Five Hundred Canadian dollars (CAD$525.00) (<--okay, so which is it, $500 or $525??) which is less then the regular fee for licensing the images not too mention Getty has incurred costs such as their external costs in locating the infringement and their internal costs in enforcing our copyright but they are offering the reduced settlement amount as a good faith gesture.  I have requested a legal settlement and release document for your review  (see attachment) which may address your concerns regarding the right to pursue these infringments.

My only position in this matter is to assist you in a resolution with Getty.  After you have had the opportunity to review all of the information that I am providing please advise how you wish to proceed so I can notify Getty and either continue with the setlement or refer the file back.



Has anyone had similar contact with these guys like this?  I find it amusing that they thanked me for my email (which I didn't send!) and the fact that they take the time to s-p-e-l-l o-u-t the $500, and then give a different price in brackets.

I'm at the point where I just want to make this go away - am I giving up too easy??

2
Getty Images Letter Forum / Preparation for 'next round of extortion'
« on: June 30, 2012, 11:05:17 AM »
Hi there,

First, let me say thanks to Matthew and all those responsible for providing all the information in these forums.  I've been reading through off and on for several months now since I received the dreaded 'first Getty letter', and it's nice to know I'm not in this one alone.

It would seem my case is at the 'low-end' of the spectrum - I received a letter last December (we'll call it my early Christmas present) demanding $1050 for a single image that appeared on my website for all of a month (a tiny thumbnail posted there by my web designer).  Nevertheless, I won't be passing blame here - it was unintentional, and as owner of the website, I'm fine with taking responsibility.

After hours of reading up on response suggestions to the letter, I responded to Getty via email rather quickly to inform them that I had immediately removed the image, and that I thought the $1050 claim was a little unreasonable, and even went as far as to offer a lesser amount.  This (as per the 'modus operandi' I have come to learn about in these forums) was refused by Getty via email, to which I responded requesting their proof of title and exclusitivity of the copyright, and the date they obtained the right to distribute the image, as well as the breakdown of the costs that poor Getty has 'incurred as a result'.  Their response was short - that information 'would be made apparent through discovery, should the matter reach the court'.

I simply stopped responding at that point, and patiently waited for their next letter.  Their printer must have jammed at one point, because I received two copies of the same letter, dated Feb 17th, 2012 about a week apart.  I did not respond to this one, as I did see a point in getting yet another cookie-cutter response.

Fast forward to May - I (as per the schedule) received a letter from NCS IP Solutions with another offer of settlement.  I have since responded with a short letter indicating that because there never has been proof of title provided, and there is no civil judgement against me, that Getty merely is making a claim, and there is no debt to collect, and therefore requested that they no longer contact me.

So, this leads me to my question - as per the outline layed out by numerous posters in these forums, I am expecting now that in the future I will receive a letter from one of their now-famous copyright lawyers.  Although I've found a lot of information regarding responding to Getty/NCS - I am wondering about a response I need to make to any legal-eagles that are hired by Getty to chase little ol' me for $1050?  Further to this, I am located in Canada, and while a lot of the information refers to laws in the U.S., are there any special considerations I need to keep in mind being located outside the U.S.   

I realize the underlying tone in the forums is that it would be hard to imagine someone in Canada being sued by a law firm from Washington State for a dollar figure of $1000, but I'm just trying to remain informed, prepared and level-headed about things.

Any suggestions?

Thanks!

Pages: [1]
Official ELI Help Options
Get Help With Your Extortion Letter | ELI Phone Support Call | ELI Defense Letter Program
Show your support of the ELI website & ELI Forums through a PayPal Contribution. Thank you for supporting the ongoing fight and reporting of Extortion Settlement Demand Letters.