Has this Final Rule (www.copyright.gov/fedreg/2012/77fr40268.pdf‎) been analyzed on this forum yet? I looked and searched, but could not locate anything.
This rule appears to be trending towards adoption of the holdings in Muench, Bean, Alaska Stock, and Changa by requiring more information in the copyright application for Automated Databases that Predominantly Consist of Photographs where protection of the individual photos is to be included. The new rule now states and requires:
"the Copyright Office concludes that when a registration is made for a database consisting predominantly of photographs, and the copyright claim extends to the individual photographs themselves, each of those photographs must be included as part of the deposit accompanying the application."
More important, the discussion under the heading Other Issues, goes on to say that applicants/claimants are "advised that it is in their interest to specifically identify:
(1) the author of each of the component works, and
(2) for each author, the title of each of his or her component works on the application."
The text goes on to say "... applicants who do not specifically identify each author and title run the risk that their registrations will be considered not to extend to each work in the group. And regardless of the outcome of that litigation, specific identification of each author and title creates a more accurate and informative public record."
While not yet part of the law, this latter provision seems to be a clear indicator of the current mindset at the Copyright Office.
This rule appears to be trending towards adoption of the holdings in Muench, Bean, Alaska Stock, and Changa by requiring more information in the copyright application for Automated Databases that Predominantly Consist of Photographs where protection of the individual photos is to be included. The new rule now states and requires:
"the Copyright Office concludes that when a registration is made for a database consisting predominantly of photographs, and the copyright claim extends to the individual photographs themselves, each of those photographs must be included as part of the deposit accompanying the application."
More important, the discussion under the heading Other Issues, goes on to say that applicants/claimants are "advised that it is in their interest to specifically identify:
(1) the author of each of the component works, and
(2) for each author, the title of each of his or her component works on the application."
The text goes on to say "... applicants who do not specifically identify each author and title run the risk that their registrations will be considered not to extend to each work in the group. And regardless of the outcome of that litigation, specific identification of each author and title creates a more accurate and informative public record."
While not yet part of the law, this latter provision seems to be a clear indicator of the current mindset at the Copyright Office.