The old LE/LL/DP forum has been frozen as to not encourage discussions about her and her antics. But her out of context digs at April, me, and Robert are getting tiresome. How many propaganda videos has Linda produced now?
She has resorted to the "Blurred Lines" strategy. Meaning, if one person who has an independent thought that decides to criticize or rebut her, then EVERYONE ELSE is "guilty" of the deed.
So, since YOU, Greg, wrote your commentary, you do understand that the REST OF US are "guilty" by association. Whatever YOU said suddenly becomes THEY said and wrote it. And if April writes something, the rest of us wrote it too. And because I wrote this post, the others are responsible for what I wrote. See that wonderful logic? Very convenient.
Robert posted his memes and suddenly WE are responsible.
In 2013, April makes her own post about with a title about "wanting to come after her" because she found about a $100K letter sent to an author she supports but "I am" / "WE are" supposedly responsible and a "danger" to her and "threatening her and her family's personal safety"
April shares a popular Youtube video of "The Hearse Song" and suddenly WE are / I am making "death threats" against her. Does Linda Ellis need to be reminded that The Dash Poem (to quote a GA Supreme Court Justice who said it in open court), the "DASH POEM is ALL ABOUT DEATH and a TOMBSTONE!" Linda can write about life, death, and a tombstone but if someone else makes a reference to "death" and a "tombstone" or being "put into the ground", SHE is suddenly screaming and crying that she is receiving a "death threat."
Linda and her lawyer tries to convince a lower court judge that ELI is trying to terrorize copyright extortionists. Who is "terrorizing" who? It seems to me, there is long list of photographers/agencies/firms, and a poet issuing MANY letters every year to legally-ignorant people threatening to sue them for thousands or tens of thousands of dollars under the argument of "I am just protecting my copyright" which is a line of horseshit if I ever heard one.
At first, I was supposedly "stalking" Linda. Then, it became "WE" were cyberstalking her after I unanimously won in GA Supreme Court. Now, Linda is crying "WE" are CYBERBULLYING her since the cyberstalking shtick didn't hold water. This crying about her being a cyberbullying victim is an insult to true victims of cyberbullying. Let's ask April Brown to go look into her email files and dig out what she has received from upset, distressed people. WHO is "cyberbullying" who? Who is incessantly sending emails to people to cough up $7,500?
Yes, WE are the cyberstalkers and cyberbullies because WE are the people sending out $2,500, $5,000, $7,500, and $100,000 extortion letters over the sharing of a $10 poem, right? And WE are the cyberstalkers and cyberbullies for daring to speak out, criticize, and insult, right?
Yes, WE are the ones who crop, alter, and blur court exhibits to a lower court judge (unfamiliar with 1st Amendment and Section 230 CDA laws) to twist and exaggerate the truth so that he cannot see not one ENTIRE DISCUSSION in context, right?
Yes, WE are the ones who made her lawyer look like shit in the highest court of Georgia, right? So much so, that the lawyer probably wants little or nothing to do with her client anymore. It couldn't be that she was unprepared, foolish, and the case should have been dismissed to begin with and the complaints didn't hold water. Successfully fooling and exaggerating to a lower court judge with bogus, altered exhibits does NOT count as true and complete evidence. Playing a selective 90-seconds from a 30-minute Internet show episode with FULL DISCLAIMERS does not count as true, complete evidence either.
Yes, WE are the ones who went out of her way to harass April's husband, taking out a Google Adword campaign against her, and have an email war with her and then calls April "obsessed". Who was obsessed in 2011, nagging, threatening, insulting someone via an email war to get thousands of dollars in the middle of the night? Who is OBSESSED with threatening their fans and trying to force them to pay thousands of dollars because they were enthralled with a viral poem?
Yes, WE are forcing people to visit and cry to April Brown. It can't be that upset people who receive $7,500 extortion letters run to the first person they find in Google who stood up and fought back the Linda Lyric's demand letters, right?
Yes, April was such a timid mouse before she met me and the rest of "us", right? Of course, WE made April "obsessive". It couldn't because April is sick and tired of people crying to her out of the blue uninvited about the same shit, year after year. It couldn't because she has become impatient and tired of all the complaints about getting threatening letters for sharing the Dash Poem, right? Because WE are responsible for that, right?
GIVE ME A FUCKING BREAK! (Oh, no! Because of that GMAFB statement, someone is now going to get a screenshot and crop out all the other words/phrases and cry to another judge that this is a sexual threat and the safety of her bones is in question. A supposedly world-famous poet of a viral poem who "forgets" the concept of SNARK, SATIRE, FIGURATIVE EXPRESSIONS, EPITHETS, and RHETORICAL HYPERBOLE, right?)
If Linda wants April to stop being so "obsessive", maybe Linda needs to issue a full, heartfelt apology to April for the aggravation she has caused and inflicted upon April. Come to think of it, maybe Linda needs to start issuing apologies to a LOT of people. Crazy idea, I know.